These are some scans of an old pamphlet from Simco Products, Inc. from 1966.
Some of you may find it interesting or helpful. I have never rewound a motor - seems like quite the technical task!!!




Regards,
Posted 09 July 2009 - 12:54 PM
Posted 10 July 2009 - 07:50 AM
Posted 10 July 2009 - 08:02 AM
Gregory Wells
Never forget that first place goes to the racer with the MOST laps, not the racer with the FASTEST lap
Posted 10 July 2009 - 08:31 AM
Slots-4-Ever
Brian McPherson
REM Raceway
"We didn't realize we were making memories, we just knew we were having FUN!"
Posted 10 July 2009 - 08:42 AM
Posted 10 July 2009 - 09:17 AM
Anthony 'Tonyp' Przybylowicz
5/28/50-12/20/21
Requiescat in Pace
Posted 10 July 2009 - 10:31 AM
Team Rolling Hills circa '66-'68
Posted 10 July 2009 - 10:55 AM
Yeah, everything you needed was available right over the counter... even individual arm parts... comms, plates, complete blanks, wire... even epoxy, etc. My friends and I were crazed with the whole "mystery behind the motor", and it was GOOD for slots because the tracks sold a bunch of this stuff and people were winding/trying/burning/winding again. That of course was outside of the fact that people were not just running those motors but racing them, too. Back then, if your car cleared the track by 1/16", the body covered the chassis and it wasn't wider than allowed... anything was allowed as far as motors.When I started racing the rewinding side of the hobby was big. All the over-the-counter chassis were pretty much all pretty close in the handling department. Now if you could wind a fast motor you could really see the difference on the track.
Respectfully... not at all because of what I said above. Spec motors and homebrew both *could* easily have a place in current slots... it's the money that's the problem, not the motors, and there's no reason why those motors have to be part of a many hundreds of dollars car. Sure, some people won't be able to drive them or even be attracted to them... but the kick from spinning up a motor that you wound yourself (even if it's not the best thing around) is hard to beat.To be quite frank, I sure am glad that we don't do that anymore. A motor that is standard is just much better for the hobby. At least in my opinion.
Posted 10 July 2009 - 11:31 AM
Posted 10 July 2009 - 11:34 AM
"... a good and wholesome thing is a little harmless fun in this world; it tones a body up and keeps him human and prevents him from souring." - Mark Twain
Posted 10 July 2009 - 11:37 AM
Posted 10 July 2009 - 12:09 PM
That sounds about right, Bill (the 2.4 ohms part and the ugly duckling part as I've sure done my share!). I had a heckuva time getting started again myself. After all those years, I could remember the basics, but the all-important feel was gone.Well, I just finished my first wind in 20 or so years, talk about an ugly duckling and no, I'm not going to post any photos of it, would not want to scare any of you, although it did come in at 2.4 ohms, 45t #28. And yes, I did get them all on there.
Posted 10 July 2009 - 10:34 PM
Posted 11 July 2009 - 06:56 AM
Ron, when you go, take plenty of photos to post here. We'll help.Sadly I don't know enough about the motors and chassis yet to pick neat stuff out of his boxes of 'junk'... but I am learning!
Posted 11 July 2009 - 08:24 AM
Posted 11 July 2009 - 09:47 AM
Don't listen to Bill, just send the whole lot to me and I'll find the good stuff and return the rest... that way you'll know for sure which is which.Ron, when you go, take plenty of photos to post here. We'll help.
Posted 11 July 2009 - 10:46 AM
Posted 11 July 2009 - 03:04 PM
Posted 11 July 2009 - 08:12 PM
Posted 11 July 2009 - 08:41 PM
Posted 12 July 2009 - 01:50 PM
Posted 12 July 2009 - 02:03 PM
Posted 12 July 2009 - 04:38 PM
Hi,
Then, most tracks gave the pamphlets away free to promote selling the wire.
Fate
Posted 13 July 2009 - 11:43 AM