Routed vs Tomy plastic track
#1
Posted 19 July 2010 - 01:17 AM
I understand why custom routed tracks cost so much more than snap track (all handmade, custom work) but are they really that much better? Most of the HO routed tracks I have seen pictures of could probably have been assembled with snap track. Simple back and forth, left right kind of layouts usually with at least one "wiggle" section in it. No "racing line" lane spacing on any of the corners, very few cool sweeping, organic-looking corners. Pretty straight ahead layouts. I guess I'd say that IMO they don't usually look much more realistic (as far as layout design) than plastic track does.
Again. Why are routed tracks considered better? What are their advantages?
If I were to do a routed track I'd like one with a free flowing, natural layout that would not only look more like an actual road course but would drive like one as well. I would like it to have a natural rythm and flow. I'd also like at least a few corners that replicated actual racing lines, where the cars all tuck closer together into the "groove". The way I'd do that so the cars wouldn't actually ever touch or bump is I'd have the lane spacing a bit wider than normal to begin with. If they had an extra 1/2" or so spacing on the straights that way they could "tuck in" on the corners and still not touch.
Thoughts?
#2
Posted 19 July 2010 - 03:07 AM
I'm sure a lot of others will give you a more in-depth idea of why, but I have ran on both and O simply believe its a matter of if you plan to go "crazy" into the hobby and race on the best possible surface, power, and layouts... routed tracks are the ONLY way to go in the way of hosting "regional", "national", or "world" events... but of course we are talking about being a raceway or taking this to a "professional" level.
Routed tracks eliminate many of the problems with the snap-together Toys R Us $19.95 specials, there are no "click" clack sounds when the cars go across each snap-together section, the power is much more "steady" and smooth than a snap-together track, and the routed tracks don't move and usually come with a fancy digital lap counter system such as TrackMate with a 22 volt adjustable power supply, just to name a few of the bells and whistles that people get for the track.
It's not a matter of routed tracks looking special. IMO its simply racing on the best possible surface and crisp, smooth power. The rails are one continuous rail on each side of the lane around the entire track so no start stop-start, stop-push the car... trying to get the lane cleaned off or making sure each snap section is fit snuggly.
Two tracks built exactly the same... one routed and the other a Tomy type track.
The lap times come down drastically when you eliminate all the problems from the Tomy/AFX/Riggen/Autoworld type tracks.
Mark Craven
#3
Posted 19 July 2010 - 06:18 AM
I have been playing with HO scale slot cars on plastic track for the last 40 years or so and I do have a small four-lane layout in my house and it is plenty of fun for the kids and me. It works fine and has no dead spots and we have plenty of fun on it .
I do have a friend and by the name of Dom and he has races at his house on his routed track and it is the best one I have ever got to run on. He had a plastic layout on the same table and there is no comparison between the two - the routed one is the best and the plastic one did the job until he broke the bank and did the routed track.
Both were top notch with no expense spared.
So I guess it comes down to price verse quality as they both work but the routed track is the best.
Dom's track,can you say smooooooth
My track
Yes, there is a big difference with size between the two, Dom's is gigantic and mine is a 3 by 7 foot layout.
"Drive it like you're in it!!!"
"If everything feels under control... you are not going fast enough!"
Some people are like Slinkies... they're really good for nothing... but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
#4
Posted 19 July 2010 - 07:50 AM
The main reason you do not see tracks like you describe is two reasons:
1) for races held by HOPRA, UFHORA (the main national organizations for current production HO slot cars), there is a rule where no "trick track sections" are allowed, i.e. squeeze tracks, criss-crosses, etc. This obviously pertains to sectional track, but the idea is that everyone is racing the track and not being concerned with being nerfed out at these special sections. You also never see banked turns on a National Championship track, at least none that I have ever seen.
2) Most of the routed tracks are built on standard "sections", which are then pieced together. Most of the time they are done on CNC controlled machines. This keeps the cost down to a reasonable level, sometimes not very much more than the sectional route if you were buying all the track at retail pricing. What you describe would require a lot of hand routing, which is very time consuming since you have to route three very small grooves for each lane. Sure it can be done, but most people would balk at the price to pay someone to do it. If that's what you want, you'll probably need to learn to do it yourself unless you have a lot of money to spend.
And that's probably the main reason you do not see tracks like that. But you'll notice some 1/32 routed home tracks here on the blog that do look that way, which are easier since you only have one slot to rout and the routing bits are bigger and less fragile.
#5
Posted 19 July 2010 - 07:59 AM
As always, time vs money.
Also keep in mind some routed tracks use thicker rails which increases the downforce in magnet cars. For older AFX type cars that seems to be OK, but for current high down-force cars, in my opinion it's too much of a good thing.
#6
Posted 21 July 2010 - 12:00 AM
I have a large six lane Tomy HO slot car track. The track is built on three wood sections for a total length of 24 feet by 6 feet. The lap length is around 91 foot and the total plastic sections number around 500 pieces. I think that a routed track is much easier to maintain than a plastic track. The plastic track has corrosion between joints, broken plastic sections, and is much harder on pick up shoes compared to a routed track. I would say that the only advantage of the plastic track is the lower cost compared to a routed track. I have had this track since 1995 and have moved the track for large races. I believe that having a plastic track is good for the local club, but hard on the track owner.
John K. Wakamatsu
SCHOR Member
#7
Posted 21 July 2010 - 12:05 AM
I forgot to tell you that I have had many NEO and Unlimited HO races on my track without any rail problems. I have raced on some routed tracks which had some rail problems, but these were solved by regluing the rail. The biggest problem for my track is corrosion between the sections which causes low voltage surges. I also have to work on the track before each race because our SCHOR club likes to run NEO HO slot cars. I also like to run Unlimited HO slot cars on my track.
John K. Wakamatsu
#8
Posted 21 July 2010 - 11:43 AM
This is the biggest problem with sectional track. Many years ago I got to race on many of Dale Bucks wood tracks and am spoiled! Sound is another problem with plastics as well and after running on a wood track were you get to hear the motors rev and so smooth.... The plastics drum so bad and the faster the cars the louder they get.
I had raced on plastics for many years and had a lot of great races but when you get the chance to run on wood it's just another level up. I got a new HO track a couple of months ago and was going to build a home track. It's just not the same so now I will sell my new Giant Rwy and most of my Ho's. I'm planning to build a 1/32 wood track now.
Barney Poynor
12/26/51-1/31/22
Requiescat in Pace
#9
Posted 21 July 2010 - 12:47 PM
#10
Posted 21 July 2010 - 04:41 PM
Then in the early 80's the Puma tracks came out and they were ok with braid but the rail tracks Dale built were super and built like a piece of furniture and beautiful but cost was high also!
Barney Poynor
12/26/51-1/31/22
Requiescat in Pace
#11
Posted 21 July 2010 - 08:11 PM
I remember some people took the rails out of sectional track, glued the sections together, and then laid continuous rail in. Man, is that a LOT of work....
#12
Posted 02 August 2010 - 12:51 AM
My track is a continuous railed Tomy layout that was built by a guy name Gene Belgarde from San Diego. It is back filled with epoxy and glued together also so the the track does not change due to heat and cold,continuous railed and epoxy painted and it has great traction. I have had four 8 Hour endurance races since 2007 and is a great track to race on. It is very bullet proof but the summers AZ have caused some small issues that I fixed by filling with epoxy , the track is in my garage so it gets very hot. Glenn
#13
Posted 02 August 2010 - 02:30 AM
Barney Poynor
12/26/51-1/31/22
Requiescat in Pace
#14
Posted 02 August 2010 - 07:28 AM
There was also a very nice 21st Century track at the 96 Nats. I took 5th in R/O, just missed the move-up to the main thanks to some of the rails being a little low, and letting my pick-up shoes wear just a bit too much to handle the low height. Oh well.
#15
Posted 02 August 2010 - 07:31 AM
#16
Posted 02 August 2010 - 11:22 AM
He most likely raced a Scorpion track design. I think the first one was built for Brian Lowe in Washington but it has been sold now. Your track sounds nice Glenn!
that track i9s back with the SCHOR group,Eddie Torrez bought it a couple years ago from B.Lowe,and Gary Morgan brought to Eddie from Washinton to Alta Loma Calif,we've(SCHOR)has been racing on it over the past 2 years.
and Glenn Gordons track is awesome too,we used to race on it when it was in San Diego at the home of Dennis Tate,,,,,
8/16/49-9/18/13
Requiescat in Pace
#18
Posted 02 August 2010 - 04:39 PM
"Everything you love, everything meaningful with depth and history, all passionate authentic experiences will be appropriated, mishandled, watered down, cheapened, repackaged, marketed, and sold to people you hate." Von Dutch [Kenneth R. Howard] 1929-1992
."If there is, in fact, a Heaven and a Hell, all we know for sure is that Hell will be a viciously overcrowded version of Pheonix." Dr Hunter S Thompson 1937-2005
"Whither goest thou, America, in thy shiny car in the night?" - Jack Kerouac 1927-1969
"Hold my stones". Keith Stone
My link
#19
Posted 02 August 2010 - 04:58 PM
Barney Poynor
12/26/51-1/31/22
Requiescat in Pace
#20
Posted 02 August 2010 - 05:12 PM
Hey Glenn did you race USRA back in the 80's in Phoenix? Beautiful track!
#21
Posted 02 August 2010 - 05:14 PM
#22
Posted 02 August 2010 - 05:40 PM
Good to hear from you. Michael Singleton....Wow!, say hello for me next time you talk to him. He, Henry, my son and I drove to the 85' Nats at PA"s track and had a BLAST! Ask him about the little town in Texas we stopped to have breakfast in and what Henry did.... that was funny!
No I started Front Line Products my self, Guy had another company. I'm busy with Team CORT now so HO's are out for now but maybe in the future....? I'm building a 1/32 home track as we have been having fun at Dennis Samson's home track of late.
Check this post out and videos also on post #8
Racing at The Stone
Barney Poynor
12/26/51-1/31/22
Requiescat in Pace
#23
Posted 03 February 2011 - 08:36 PM
#24
Posted 30 April 2011 - 02:47 AM
Karl Hoffheins
4/8/65-8/16/22
Requiescat in Pace
#25
Posted 30 July 2011 - 11:06 PM
I've raced on all kinds of track and the routed is much smoother, all types of cars run soooo much smoother.