This is what these cars looked like in the day:



I guess these would be the ideal cars for Nesta, hey!

Posted 14 February 2011 - 10:02 PM
Philippe de Lespinay
Posted 14 February 2011 - 10:40 PM
Posted 15 February 2011 - 05:10 PM
"TANSTAAFL" (There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.)
Robert Anson Heinlein
"Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude."
Alexis de Tocqueville
"In practice, socialism didn't work. But socialism could never have worked because it is based on false premises about human psychology and society, and gross ignorance of human economy."
David Horowitz
Mike Brannian
Posted 15 February 2011 - 06:10 PM
Posted 15 February 2011 - 07:20 PM
They were issued in early 1967 at a time when they were already obsolete. They ran poorly because they had no traction from their hard rubber tires. Fitting foam tires helped them greatly. But they failed spectacularly in the marketplace.What year did they release them for sale, I've seen the body but I've never seen the whole car before. How did they work compared with the other cars of the same era?
Philippe de Lespinay
Posted 15 February 2011 - 08:12 PM
Posted 15 February 2011 - 08:40 PM
I am not a doctor, but I played one as a child with the girl next door.
Posted 15 February 2011 - 10:23 PM
Posted 15 February 2011 - 10:40 PM
Nesta,For some reason I fell some pain!
Philippe de Lespinay
Posted 16 February 2011 - 01:26 AM
...the drop arm would have to be captured so as to not "deploy" itself in the middle of its high-impact Nestification.
"TANSTAAFL" (There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.)
Robert Anson Heinlein
"Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude."
Alexis de Tocqueville
"In practice, socialism didn't work. But socialism could never have worked because it is based on false premises about human psychology and society, and gross ignorance of human economy."
David Horowitz
Mike Brannian
Posted 16 February 2011 - 03:29 AM
Posted 16 February 2011 - 03:32 AM
Posted 16 February 2011 - 10:24 AM
Philippe de Lespinay
Posted 16 February 2011 - 07:09 PM
Posted 22 April 2011 - 08:57 AM
They were issued in early 1967 at a time when they were already obsolete. They ran poorly because they had no traction from their hard rubber tires. Fitting foam tires helped them greatly. But they failed spectacularly in the marketplace.
As far as rental cars, they were indestructible but the drop arm would have to be captured so as to not "deploy" itself in the middle of its high-impact Nestification.
Because of their heavy chassis, they were not tilting too much like many of the period cars, so they were not half as bad as many. But the same body fitted over a Dynamic sidewinder and a 26D would have cleaned their clock.
Posted 22 April 2011 - 09:19 AM
A difficult proposition indeed...De-Nestification?
Philippe de Lespinay
Posted 21 June 2011 - 05:46 PM
Glenn Orban
NJ Vintage Racing
NJ Scale Racing
C.A.R.S. Vintage Slot Car Club
Posted 26 June 2011 - 04:48 PM
Posted 04 July 2011 - 11:56 AM
Glenn Orban
NJ Vintage Racing
NJ Scale Racing
C.A.R.S. Vintage Slot Car Club