I noticed the newest models come with instructions "For best performance, recommended voltage is 12v - 13.4.volts DC DO NOT break-in motor underwater. This will shorten the motor run life! Run motor in at 5 volts for a period of 10-15 minutes."

Posted 09 July 2008 - 08:05 PM
Paul Wolcott
Posted 09 July 2008 - 08:29 PM
Mike Swiss
Inventor of the Low CG guide flag 4/20/18
IRRA® Components Committee Chairman
Five-time USRA National Champion (two G7, one G27, two G7 Senior)
Two-time G7 World Champion (1988, 1990), eight G7 main appearances
Eight-time G7 King track single lap world record holder
17B West Ogden Ave., Westmont, IL 60559, (708) 203-8003, mikeswiss86@hotmail.com (also my PayPal address)
Note: Send all USPS packages and mail to: 692 Citadel Drive, Westmont, Illinois 60559
Posted 09 July 2008 - 08:42 PM
Paul Wolcott
Posted 09 July 2008 - 08:55 PM
Posted 10 July 2008 - 06:47 AM
Jim "Butch" Dunaway
I don't always go the extra mile, but when I do it's because I missed my exit.
All my life I've strived to keep from becoming a millionaire, so far I've succeeded.
There are three kinds of people in the world, those that are good at math and those that aren't.
No matter how big of a hammer you use, you can't pound common sense into stupid people, believe me, I've tried.
Posted 10 July 2008 - 06:59 AM
Jersey John Molnar
"Certified Tony P Chassis God 2007.2023
RETRO EAST 2025 Constructor Champion
Posted 10 July 2008 - 07:00 AM
Joe "Noose" Neumeister
Sometimes known as a serial despoiler of the clear purity of virgin Lexan bodies. Lexan is my canvas!
Noose Custom Painting - Since 1967
Chairman - IRRA® Body Committee - Roving IRRA® Tech Dude - "EVIL BUCKS Painter"
"Team Evil Bucks" Racer - 2016 Caribbean Retro Overall Champion
The only thing bad about Retro is admitting that you remember doing it originally.
Posted 10 July 2008 - 07:12 AM
Anthony 'Tonyp' Przybylowicz
5/28/50-12/20/21
Requiescat in Pace
Posted 10 July 2008 - 07:43 AM
John,But you just don't know when they will POP.
Posted 10 July 2008 - 08:02 AM
Jersey John Molnar
"Certified Tony P Chassis God 2007.2023
RETRO EAST 2025 Constructor Champion
Posted 10 July 2008 - 08:28 AM
Posted 10 July 2008 - 08:53 AM
Philippe de Lespinay
Posted 10 July 2008 - 03:17 PM
John Warren
Slot cars are my preferred reality
Posted 10 July 2008 - 03:27 PM
Are the brushes still installed with the brush face curvature at 90 degrees to the comm? I have not opened a new one in a long time, but I seem to remember the F5 and the Slick 7 motor were like that.It may be that timing probably increases as the brushes wear. With the brushes on arms they move towards the commutator in an arc instead of staying in the same plane. I am sure Ron could comment more.
Posted 10 July 2008 - 04:03 PM
Yup.Are the brushes still installed with the brush face curvature at 90 degrees to the comm?
Paul Wolcott
Posted 10 July 2008 - 09:32 PM
Posted 10 July 2008 - 10:07 PM
Posted 10 July 2008 - 10:10 PM
You better find out what type of zapper the "zapped VII" is zapped with. If it's not a zapper made for rare earth magnet material, you're wasting your hard-earned dollars on something that can't be done on a "ceramic" type zapper.We are able to purchase a VII and for a couple more dollars we can get the "zapped VII".
Posted 10 July 2008 - 10:13 PM
Yep... still backwards engineering when it comes to the brushes in those motors being 90 degrees off.Are the brushes still installed with the brush face curvature at 90 degrees to the comm? I have not opened a new one in a long time, but I seem to remember the F5 and the Slick 7 motor were like that.
If that's the case, then there's probably more timing change during break-in than there will be from when the brushes are fully broken in till when they're worn out.
Posted 11 July 2008 - 12:06 AM
Are you getting your degrees and gauss mucked up?.
Take a P-S set-up... take the readings...900 avg... put in over at 200 degrees for 3 minutes take them out read them, you will find they read about 750 degrees. Let them cool back to room temp and they will go back to 900.
Posted 11 July 2008 - 01:22 AM
Yep, I meant points.Are you getting your degrees and gauss mucked up?
Posted 11 July 2008 - 09:29 AM
May I suggest a chastising letter to the designer of this motor, the Mabuchi Company, which has so far produced nearly one BILLION of these engineering heresies to power the rear-view mirrors of over 500 million cars in the past 40 years? Has anyone here ever had a rear-view mirror motor fail on them?Yep... still backwards engineering when it comes to the brushes in those motors being 90 degrees off.
Philippe de Lespinay
Posted 11 July 2008 - 10:32 AM
Posted 11 July 2008 - 11:01 AM
Posted 11 July 2008 - 11:05 AM
Parma 16D... as close to a Russkit 23 as you can get today and in the past 20 years or so with greater improvements over the 23. The Parma 16D would have also cost buck fifty in '66'with better life and performance than a 23 and the FK motor.Many think that the Falcon motors are the best physical implement ever to happen to the slot car world since the Russkit 23 motor. A Falcon 7 would have cost about a buck fifty in 1966, about 1/3rd of the least expensive Mabuchi motor of the period, for greatly superior performance AND life.
So please give it a rest.