
New Forum for Eurosport/GT12
#1
Posted 30 December 2008 - 08:50 AM
Gregory Wells
Never forget that first place goes to the racer with the MOST laps, not the racer with the FASTEST lap
#2
Posted 30 December 2008 - 10:06 AM
I've got a LOT to learn about these little ballistic beasties!! BPR is having a monthly GT12 and Euro race on the third Saturday of the month I believe on the fLat track!
Even if you don't want to spend the $ for Euro - come GT12 racing!! These guys are really quick and not very expensive to build! Great bang for your $$$!!
So dig out your old 12 motors and freshen them up!! Because you're on the flat track, they don't need to be ballistic to be quick! Come play with us!!
Tim
#3
Posted 30 December 2008 - 02:16 PM
11/27/57-8/12/22
Requiescat in Pace
#4
Posted 30 December 2008 - 03:15 PM
Tim
#5
Posted 30 December 2008 - 03:20 PM
By the way, Tim... what the heck does FWIW mean???

C
11/27/57-8/12/22
Requiescat in Pace
#7
Posted 30 December 2008 - 03:57 PM

11/27/57-8/12/22
Requiescat in Pace
#8
Posted 31 December 2008 - 12:36 AM


HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!
Tim
#9
Posted 31 December 2008 - 01:01 AM
hell bent on going no where fast
#10
Posted 31 December 2008 - 07:17 AM
What about the ISRA Open 12 class. It's a C-can based class but now with Open chassis rules.
I've seen R. Mack Open 12 chassis for $190, and Saunders for $225. Mossetti is the cheap one at $150.
How do these chassis compare to say the S7 ones, for us not so financially well off racers?? Can the GT12 type chassis compete?
Thanks...
GTP Joe Connolly
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice there is.
#11
Posted 31 December 2008 - 11:53 AM
I think that most of the ISRA/USA Northeast guys are using lower-cost GT12 chassis as a base for Open GP12. The rules allow you to make any mods you think will help. A little like scratchbuilding.
On high-speed tracks, most find the Eurosport type Open-12 chassis too fragile. Dominic is a master at adapting GT12 to Open-12. Take a look at some of his builds.
Lou
Lou Pirro
6/13/53-9/21/23
Requiescat in Pace
#12
Posted 31 December 2008 - 11:57 AM
8/13/58-3/18/21
Requiescat in Pace
#13
Posted 01 January 2009 - 11:33 AM
What is the trick to getting either of those chassis to work well on a flat track? I have an Asp 4 and I could not get it around very well on a flat track when I got the chassis and pretty much gave up on it. Do you get the kit and assemble it or just get the pre-built one?
Right now my favorite Open-12 chassis is the JK Cheetah-11...
#14
Posted 01 January 2009 - 11:58 AM
Joe, the Asp 4 will be just fine and compete very well. When we can line up some time at NFS I'll give you a hand fine-tuning. Don't forget that I am still using GT-12 Chassis like the older Mossetti, JK, and Asp 3. These lesser-expensive chassis work great as long as the same basic rule is followed with building any chassis, no stress points! It is doesn't line up right, don't force it.
A motor is only as fast as the chassis it's in.
Dominic Luongo
Like Dominator Custom Chassis on Facebook
NERR photos from 2012-April 2016
NERR photos from 2016 to now
#15
Posted 01 January 2009 - 03:49 PM
Thanks. Will do.
Dom, just let me know what's good for you and I'll try and work out my schedule around that...
See ya!!
GTP Joe Connolly
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice there is.
#16
Posted 01 January 2009 - 04:29 PM
Gee, I wonder why people can't spell or write cogent sentences anymore…That's too funny, a web site that tells how to talk in acronyms.

???-2020
Requiescat in Pace
" First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi
Studio link
#18
Posted 01 January 2009 - 06:17 PM

???-2020
Requiescat in Pace
" First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi
Studio link
#19
Posted 01 January 2009 - 07:40 PM
Jay,Well that certainly explained why I can't read my students' handwriting; but does not explain why adults can't spell correctly.
I think one reason may be people that don't have to do any technical writing or writing in general in their day-to-day activities have a tendency to lose what they were taught. From my experience with arithmetic; I had a job that didn't require the use of mathematics that much. Then I lost that job; went back to college later in life and for some reason (not using it) I had a heck of a time recalling what I'd learned in high school. So as the old saying goes, repetition is the best teacher and keeps you up to speed. However, in some cases some just ain't never learnt.

On a personal note: For me, I some times have trouble with punctuation. When to use what, where, and how. I'm working on it though.
11/27/57-8/12/22
Requiescat in Pace
#20
Posted 01 January 2009 - 08:07 PM
No Child Left Behind put an emphasis on Scantron, machine-graded tests so for much of the Bush administration writing was not emphasized as much as test-taking tactics.
That changed in my subject area this year and the students are expected to write a concise thesis statement and back it up with supporting statements drawn from multiple sources. About half of the students did pretty well and a third were excellent, much to my surprise. The downside is that we only covered half of what they will be tested on in the ten weeks we spent on the writing. When they take the test in Spring it will look like we aren't teaching them what we are supposed to.
That's what I like about slot racing, effort in-results out. GT12 should be a pretty level playing field for equipment.
Mike Boemker
#21
Posted 02 January 2009 - 01:04 AM
Yes, Keith you are 99% correct, Dokk is the Olde English spelling.I'm 99% sure that Dokk spells correctly with a "K".

???-2020
Requiescat in Pace
" First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi
Studio link
#22
Posted 02 January 2009 - 01:09 AM
And I'm critically thinking about jumping into GT12. Any suggestions, teach? I know nothing about this class.
???-2020
Requiescat in Pace
" First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi
Studio link
#23
Posted 02 January 2009 - 01:52 AM

Just do what you are good at, you don't need this GT12 gig?



Hero at your age?
BTW Happy New Year to ya.
Nesta Szabo
In this bright future you can't forget your past.
BMW (Bob Marley and the Wailers)
United we stand and divided we fall, the Legends are complete.
I'm racing the best here at BP but Father time is much better then all of us united.
Not a snob in this hobby, after all it will be gone, if we keep on going like we do, and I have nothing to prove so I keep on posting because I have nothing to gain.
It's our duty to remember the past so we can have a future.
Pistol Pete you will always be in my memory.
#24
Posted 02 January 2009 - 03:06 AM
The two chassis mentioned above both seem to go around the track just fine. The Red Fox Audi body looks real good. I don't think you can buy your way to a win in this class, equipment should be pretty equal. They are faster than Eurosports were a few years ago. Bearings are legal for the axle and for the can end of the motors; not sure about the endbell end.And I'm critically thinking about jumping into GT12. Any suggestions, teach? I know nothing about this class.
Mike Boemker
#25
Posted 02 January 2009 - 03:11 AM
Joe,How do these chassis compare to say the S7 ones, for us not so financially well off racers?? Can the GT12 type chassis compete?
I run in GT12 class in Australia and we can run any GT12 chassis. This year Slick 7 was a 1, 2 place-getter, Asp first and GTX second very competitive chassis. While the prices of the other chassis are high and are very nice but for cost and performance can't beat the S-7. As we say here in GT12: drive it like you stole it.
hell bent on going no where fast