
Hand-out motors on BPR King track
#1
Posted 04 June 2010 - 11:36 PM
I have been racing Can-Am on BPR King track for three years now.
I question the need for hand-out motors. It is not used nor needed for any other races or classes.
Is it time to remove this rule.
I have not been very lucky with hand-outs.
I have had fast motors in my box, but could not run them.
I would like to try a Falcon 7.
Is it time to move past this unneeded rule??
Please post replies. Lets try and have some faith in our fellow racers.
Thanks,
Bob
Requiescat in Pace
#2
Posted 04 June 2010 - 11:42 PM
I'm sure there will be lots of people who agree with you on this one. I would if I still ran any retro classes on the King track, but I don't so it doesn't affect me. I do agree about being able to run F7s alongside the TSR D3 the same as we can in F1 or Nascar or Coupe.
But this will drop into the same black hole that the "smaller tires for Retro Pro" discussion dropped into, I'm afraid. We have all been told often "D3 is a dictatorship"..............
#3
Posted 04 June 2010 - 11:43 PM

a change I still will buy motors but if you got a hot one why not have a chance to use them?

Bob a great topic BTW.
Nesta
Nesta Szabo
In this bright future you can't forget your past.
BMW (Bob Marley and the Wailers)
United we stand and divided we fall, the Legends are complete.
I'm racing the best here at BP but Father time is much better then all of us united.
Not a snob in this hobby, after all it will be gone, if we keep on going like we do, and I have nothing to prove so I keep on posting because I have nothing to gain.
It's our duty to remember the past so we can have a future.
Pistol Pete you will always be in my memory.
#4
Posted 05 June 2010 - 12:02 AM
???-2020
Requiescat in Pace
" First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi
Studio link
#5
Posted 05 June 2010 - 02:21 AM
?/?/1950-3/8/22
Requiescat in Pace
#6
Posted 05 June 2010 - 09:55 AM
#7
Posted 05 June 2010 - 11:42 AM
Mike, good to see you post....missed you!
Look, the handout thing started because of rumors of "parking lot" motors and such. As I keep telling you, rules are written out of fear and this was the fear.
Remember when we were doing the Falcon 5s and they were blowing up? The fix was a drop of epoxy on the com to keep it from rotating. Some people took it to mean that as Mike and I were doing this that this ment we had other cheating ideas at hand as well. I offered a solution on fixing and marking, but so many were AFRAID.
Ironically, with this fear, I was asked to actually autopsy the motors and figure out why...then got the "but if you can open and fix them, you could cheat". See how irrational this is?
We are friends here. Time to realize it is toy cars being raced with friends.
Fate
3/6/48-1/1/12
Requiescat in Pace
#8
Posted 05 June 2010 - 10:23 PM

I understand your tought's on this topic! Is there really a need of a hand out motor? Yes there is ..... And no there is not. I've read them all, each side has it's +/-'s ! as with any type of racing....1:1 and so on down the line to H.O. Racers will cheat/bend the rules unless they are monitored.


The Can-Am class at B.P. is the biggest class to race in. Some type of parity is needed, and the hand out motor seems to fill the bill. Yes Bob, it's very frustrating to have a "Hot Rod" in practice and then the "luck of the draw" takes you too the "C" main





The Friday night before the first "MEMORIAL" my ride was running 4.27's and 8's! John Sinz was there watching the laps behind the counter...... Sheeeet....I even called Mil, and told him I was in the "2's" with a tired TSR motor that I had from when I use to come down there to race with when I stayed in "BAKE-O-VILLE". Mil told me that I was in the hunt


A OUT-OF-TOWNER'S VIEW OF THINGS.....WHEN'S THE NEXT RACE ON THE KING?


#9
Posted 05 June 2010 - 10:58 PM
WHY NOT CARRY THIS OVER TO KING TRACK CAN-AM.
I have been in some form of racing since 1964. I have run SoCal USRA at differant times and been involved with a degree of rule, shall we say " How can I get an edge" bending.
In the big picture we all are good at heart, and can race with out fear that some Racer will mess with a motor.
Lets get to a point in which We can set up our cars before race day, show up run a few laps and have a good time racing.
AND TRUST OUR FELLOW RACERS WILL DO THE SAME.
Next King Track race at BPR is in July. Lets get to gether and find some fast motors and blow those SoCAl dudes away!!!
Bob
Requiescat in Pace
#10
Posted 06 June 2010 - 12:10 AM
Requiescat in Pace
#11
Posted 06 June 2010 - 12:16 AM





Their is some guys that are tweaking on four to six cars at the same time soldering in new pinons for their friends and I would like
to see them having a kick back time instead of doing this because somebody might cheat?

Sorry not cool at all.
How come nobody is cheating in F1,Coupe, Nascar or hardbody classes or JD?


cheater this post took 20 minutes to post our time, sweet right?

Nesta
Nesta Szabo
In this bright future you can't forget your past.
BMW (Bob Marley and the Wailers)
United we stand and divided we fall, the Legends are complete.
I'm racing the best here at BP but Father time is much better then all of us united.
Not a snob in this hobby, after all it will be gone, if we keep on going like we do, and I have nothing to prove so I keep on posting because I have nothing to gain.
It's our duty to remember the past so we can have a future.
Pistol Pete you will always be in my memory.
#12
Posted 06 June 2010 - 02:59 AM
In the beginning, I believe the intent of this rule was twofold: first to eliminate or reduce the "perception" of cheating (tampering with motors), the second to create a more level playing field (as far as acquiring a faster motor).
The "perception" was a period of time in the past in which some racers were questioning if some racers had an advantage in getting fast motors (I'll leave the reason to your imagination

As far as a level playing field is concerned, we all know the King track is a "motor" race. No other D3 race has as much visibility, popularity or status (as far as recognition), therefore the importance of winning this race exceeds the other D3 races (for some racers). The performance of the TSR D3 (Falcon or similar motor) motor is quite consistent for a low cost motor. But, as with any motor, the performance curve will roughly equal a "bell curve". In other words, the 80/20 rule can be applied. This means that 80% of the motors will be fairly equal in performance while 10% will be less than the average and 10% will be better than average in performance.
What this means is that in order to get one of the 10% fast motors, you will need to acquire 10 motors in order to get that one fast motor (on average). One of the 10 will be a slow (dog) motor while 8 of the 10 will be average in speed. In simple terms, this means that those racers who choose to spend the money to acquire 10 motors will most likely get that one fast motor. Guess what most of the other racers will get in performance. Yup, an average motor (80% probability) since they will not want to spend more money to get that one fast motor.
I believe the handout motor rule has eliminated anyone from "buying" their way to a fast motor. Yes, it's a crap shoot, but the vast majority of the racers will fare equally in performance without spending a lot of money to keep up with the big spenders. Also, this rule allows out of town, out of state racers to have a more equal chance of motor performance without them buying a lot of motors which they may or may not normally race at their raceway. This seems appropriate in keeping with the "low cost" appeal of D3 racing.
I believe the handout motor rule has served it's purpose well, but as with some rules, you will never satisfy everyone.
Maybe next year we can "consider" eliminating the handout motor rule, but don't hold your breath.
The above is "my personal view" (opinion) on the handout motor rule. Others in D3 probably disagree. That's OK, it's just my opinion.
By the way, the recent Western States Can Am race had almost all of the entrants buying just one motor. The race results are very consistent with past races. The fast racers always seem to do the best, regardless of whether they buy one motor or more.
Keith

Team Rolling Hills circa '66-'68
#13
Posted 06 June 2010 - 11:43 AM
I will also say every race on the King track Can-AM, or F-1, I gear both of these car's 10/29 or 10/30. The motors last all race with no problems also Jonathan, raced the TSRF motor, out of his Can-Am, in his F-1 16 heats on this little motor Dam good I would say this was at the Western States.
Stork, I wish I had the answer for you.
Steve
8/13/58-3/18/21
Requiescat in Pace
#14
Posted 06 June 2010 - 12:27 PM
Both Foamy and I stopped racing most D3 races largely over this issue.
As long as we are on rule changes I think the IRRA 100 gram minimum weight rule also has merit.
Mike Boemker
#15
Posted 06 June 2010 - 04:07 PM
?/?/1950-3/8/22
Requiescat in Pace
#16
Posted 06 June 2010 - 05:43 PM

Rick Bennardo
"Professional Tinkerer"
scrgeo@comcast.net
R-Geo Products
LIKE my Facebook page for updates, new releases, and sales: Rgeo Slots...
Lead! The easy equalizer...
#17
Posted 06 June 2010 - 07:50 PM

This is all fine and dandy









#18
Posted 07 June 2010 - 07:19 PM
I've had both good luck & bad luck, when picking motors from the styrafoam tray... Some decent ones, & some 'pooches'...

As a means of generating income for the raceway, it has been a success... As a means of keeping costs down, it's still possible to get 'lucky', & buy only one motor, & get a good one... But, in practical terms, for those of us on a limited racing budget, buying 4-5 motors in order to find that 'good one' can be an expensive proposition...
Many have decided to forego racing CanAm on the BP King, & choose to participate in other classes on other tracks there, simply because they've never gotten a good motor... I'm sympathetic to these feelings, & have found myself not racing much myself, due to financial considerations...
I'm reminded that our initial intent in creating D3 was ( is ) to provide a fun, low-cost racing environment... If removing the hand-out motor rule will stimulate participation, then it should be considered... Otherwise, there wouldn't seem to be much reason to change or 'fix' something that certainly isn't broken...
Just my opinion, guys... That two cents won't buy much, but getting everyone to consider the situation, & remember WHY we race slot cars, is truly priceless!

Take care, everyone... & of course, good racing!
Jeff Easterly

Jeff Easterly - Capt., Team Wheezer...
Asst. Mechanic, Team Zombie...
Power is coming on... NOW!!!
#19
Posted 07 June 2010 - 07:29 PM
Rick Bennardo
"Professional Tinkerer"
scrgeo@comcast.net
R-Geo Products
LIKE my Facebook page for updates, new releases, and sales: Rgeo Slots...
Lead! The easy equalizer...
#20
Posted 07 June 2010 - 08:06 PM
I won a Retro Pro race on the King not too long ago with a 68-gram car. it was a handful and tough to keep from getting ahead of me, but it worked. That day.
At the same time, my Kingleman record-holder is 134 grams. One has to adapt...

Philippe de Lespinay
#21
Posted 07 June 2010 - 08:16 PM


I go with the general crowed, but sure it sucks when you got to buy more the two to get a dissent one,

I roll either way because it is what it is, and life is good.

I have to say that the cleaning of the tracks is a bigger issue then motors because you dial your ride in for the track and then Whoops its gone?



The good thing is every on has to deal with it so it makes it fair.
Nesta
Nesta Szabo
In this bright future you can't forget your past.
BMW (Bob Marley and the Wailers)
United we stand and divided we fall, the Legends are complete.
I'm racing the best here at BP but Father time is much better then all of us united.
Not a snob in this hobby, after all it will be gone, if we keep on going like we do, and I have nothing to prove so I keep on posting because I have nothing to gain.
It's our duty to remember the past so we can have a future.
Pistol Pete you will always be in my memory.
#22
Posted 07 June 2010 - 09:15 PM

Philippe de Lespinay
#23
Posted 07 June 2010 - 09:35 PM
Why don't you guys just limit the number of hand out motors one can purchase? If only allowed to buy two on race day, the best of the two would be run. Would also keep costs down
#24
Posted 07 June 2010 - 10:11 PM
Rob, at our last Can Am race this past Saturday, I think there was only a few racers who bought more than one motor. Typically, only the fast racers buy more than one motor (if needed). The majority of racers will race with one motor since they realize they won't be on the "A" main podium regardless of how fast a motor they get.Why don't you guys just limit the number of hand out motors one can purchase? If only allowed to buy two on race day, the best of the two would be run. Would also keep costs down
Keith

Team Rolling Hills circa '66-'68
#25
Posted 07 June 2010 - 10:20 PM

But that's me.

Nesta
Nesta Szabo
In this bright future you can't forget your past.
BMW (Bob Marley and the Wailers)
United we stand and divided we fall, the Legends are complete.
I'm racing the best here at BP but Father time is much better then all of us united.
Not a snob in this hobby, after all it will be gone, if we keep on going like we do, and I have nothing to prove so I keep on posting because I have nothing to gain.
It's our duty to remember the past so we can have a future.
Pistol Pete you will always be in my memory.