Jump to content




Photo

Bud & Ted's Excellent Adventure — Dyna-Rewind!


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 ravajack

ravajack

    Race Leader

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 572 posts
  • Joined: 17-February 06
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 24 July 2013 - 12:25 PM

An interview with Dyna-Rewind's Ted Lech & Bud Stordahl
 
What does it take to create a really hot motor? Dynamic duo Ted Lech and Bud Stordahl reveals some tips and tricks about motor building from the hottest ticket around in the Midwest area in the late 1960's, the legendary Dyna-Rewind. Interview by Pete Hagenbuch in the Car Model magazine, July 1967.
 
It all began with ads in the period slot car mags. Tempting, half-page ads like the one below:
 
Dyna-Ad.jpg
 
A hot motor for only 99 cents? How is that possible? CM's Pete Hagenbuch got curious and just had to look into the business model of Dyna-Rewind of Birmingham, Michigan. He  also learned some other useful things along the way...  (Transcript following images below).
 
81b.jpg
 
82b.jpg
 
83b.jpg
 

Quote

Our Man in Detroit Talks With "Mr. Motor"
 
When Ted Lech and Bud Stordahl — of Dyna-Rewinds fame — talk, we listen!
 
by Pete Hagenbuch
 
ASK ANY DETROIT hobby shop racer who's the man to beat and you'll get the same answer every time: Ted Lech. For the past several years, Ted has been blowing them off with convincing regularity all over the metropolitan Detroit area. He owns, or has owned, the track record at every shop worth mentioning. If you ask Ted what the secret is, he'll tell you horsepower plus handling with the accent on the horsepower. And if you ask his nearest competition, they'll tell you the same thing. Ted has recently gone into the rewound motor business and his Dyna-Rewinds are cleaning up. When Ted is beaten, which happens more frequently these days, it is usually with his own motors.
 
I ran into Ted at The Groove in Royal Oak a while back and we dis­cussed the possibility of bringing some of the secrets of Dyna-Rewinds to you. Ted was agreeable and a date was set. Bud Stordahl, Ted's partner and the business end of Dyna-Rewind, was brought along and the following con­versation resulted.
 
Pete: Bud, I've been seeing your ads in CAR MODEL and elsewhere, offering a Dyna-Rewind motor for 99 cents over the price of a car kit. Isn't this a good way to go broke before you even get going?
Bud: No, we think this is a good way to introduce people to our line of motors. When you consider that we get the kits at wholesale, and keep the motor that comes in them, we even make a little on the offer. Not nearly enough to get rich but at least we don't lose our shirts.
Ted: We have a good quality product which has to be tried to be appreciated. Our return sales on the kit offer are very encouraging.
 
Pete: What, in your opinion, makes for a good quality commercial rewind?
Ted: Well, first it is the quality of the parts that go into it. Everything we use is new. We use only high temperature wire; Nylclad, Formvar and Polyther­maleze. Our winding is done on a production machine of our own manufac­ture. Number of turns and wire size are carefully chosen after testing un­der the conditions for which the motor is intended.
 
Pete: What do you mean by these conditions?
Ted: Power source — battery or power pack, length of straightway, type of car, etc.
 
Pete: You mean you offer different motors for different applications?
Ted: Yes. First we have our "mild" motor which we call the 2-volt. It has an armature resistance of .4-ohms and is usable with power pack or battery supply. This is the motor we recommend for the smaller tracks and light­er cars. Then we have our 1.3-volt model which has an armature resi­stance of .3-ohms. This one is available with either power pack or battery winding. And our top line motor is called the "Enduro." This one comes with the same winding as the 1.3-volt motors but with our Dyna 9 Indox magnets and the Polar Heat Cap. Also, on the Enduro motors, the wire connections are crimped on the commutator tabs to prevent throwing the wires in a burnout.
 
Pete: We'll get back to the Polar Heat Cap later but first, when we speak of your various models, are they available to fit popular cans?
Ted: The models I just mentioned are in the new ball bearing can size only. In order to streamline our production we are concentrating on this motor.
 
Pete: I take it you're convinced the 26D is the best motor around?
Ted: There is no comparison. It is the hottest tin can available right now.
 
Pete: I'm sure it is, at least for 1/24 scale. But I'm still not convinced of its unbeatability in 1/32 scale. I'm afraid it's a little on the tall and heavy side for good handling in the little ones.
Ted: What are you running in your Monster Merc?
 
Pete: 26D sidewinder. But there are those who claim it isn't 1/32 scale. Sure, it handles like a dream but it is a great big car. The fat can seems to go pretty well in 1/32 stockers, too, but I have yet to see a normal size 1/32 car that handles well with one. How about Dyna offering a red hot 16D can for us little car lovers?
Ted: Maybe later, if we find we can expand our product line.
 
Pete: Now, what is the Polar Heat Cap?
Ted: It is a ceramic coating applied to the commutator end of the arma­ture winding. It does two things. It conducts heat away from the commutator for cooler operation and it provides a heat resistant shell which holds the connections in place when the motor suffers a burn-out. The con­nection can be easily resoldered and the motor is as good as new.
 
Pete: Is the Polar Heat Cap any better than wrapping the connections with thread to hold the wires in place?
Ted: Yes, because the heat cap also conducts heat away from the commu­tator.
 
Pete: What other features do you build into your motors to make them reliable?
Ted: We use a high temperature solder for the commutator connections. We impregnate the winding with high temperature epoxy resin.
 
Pete: Anything else?
Ted: Yes. We bake our armatures to insure a complete cure of the epoxy impregnation. We dynamically balance, and we recharge the magnets.
 
Pete: There are a lot of old wive's tales going around about recharging magnets. Especially on tin can motors. Care to clear them up for us?
Ted: To completely recharge barium-ferrite magnets, a heavy-duty charger. capable of producing 30.000 ampere turns, is necessary. Also, to do the best job, the magnets and can should be recharged as a unit with an iron core inserted between the magnets.
 
Pete: What about all the chargers on the market which claim to be able to re-zap tin cans without disassembling them?
Ted: There are heavy-duty chargers on the market which will greatly improve the performance of a motor with weak magnets. I know of no charger which will recharge the magnets to their original condition without removing the armature and substituting the iron core I mentioned earlier.
 
Pete: How about some tune up tips for our readers?
Ted: Sure. Lightly oil the motor bearings infrequently. Never use commu­tator lubricants. Increase brush tension.
 
Pete: Care to be more specific on brush tension?
Ted: We are speaking of rewinds, of course. On the small and large Mabuchis, re-bend the stock brush springs to a 120-degree included angle. On the new ball bearing can, use the stock brush springs from the large can.
 
Pete: What about shimming magnets? I know it helps torque and brakes, but does it have any ill effects on the motor?
Ted: There is a minimum air gap below which motor cooling is adversely affected. This is also true of using too many turns in a winding. The motor's ability to pump cooling air is re­duced.
 
Pete: Is there an ideal air gap?
Ted: I like something close to .020 on a side. I would shim the magnets on the small and large cans and leave them alone on the 26D.
 
Pete: Several outfits, yourselves included, are offering high strength mag­nets, either separately or included in rewound motors. What are your thoughts on these?
Ted: It is another way to gain still higher performance. Of course, just sticking them into the motor may not do the job.
 
Pete: You mean you have to change the winding to get the full effect.
Ted: Yes. But also, at least on the small and large cans, you should remove some laminations from the armature to get the most out of the stronger magnetic field.
 
Pete: Guess I'm smarter than I realized. I've been doing this for some time just to shorten the armatures for sidewinders. What's the science here?
Ted: Very complicated. It has to do with the copper-to-iron ratio, and would take an article in itself just to touch the surface.
 
Pete: Before we leave the subject of magnets, how important is the can itself in the magnetic field? What I'm getting at is that for a side-winder you pretty well butcher up the can in order to get rear axle clearance with the proper gearing. How much of an effect does this have on the field strength?
Ted: A lot depends on the type of magnet. In the standard Mabuchi and Tradeship types, it will slightly decrease the field. But on the Indox magnets such as the Arcos and our Dyna 9s, it will seriously reduce field strength.
 
Pete: What do you think of the slot-less commutators on the late model Mabuchis?
Ted: They are more prone to burnouts than the slotted ones. Definitely not an improvement.
Bud: As soon as the details are worked out, our Dyna-Rewinds will all he using our own slotted commutators with 11-degrees advance.
 
Pete: I've been hearing a lot about your rewinding machine, but I've never seen one. Are they priced within reach of the average guy who likes to do his own rewinding?
Bud: I'm afraid it has to be considered in the luxury class for the average guy. They sell for $79.95 net and are aimed at the hobby shop owner who wants to make a little extra money by rewinding motors.
 
Pete: It really is a slick gadget. The perfect gift for "the man who has everything." Does it do a better job than hand winding or just faster?
Bud: Obviously, it is far faster and it also does a much more consistent job from one pole to the next. The tensioner is the main reason. It maintains a uniform tension on the wire at all times.
 
Pete: Ted, do you have any tips for the home rewinder? I know most of us who wind our own seem to come up with an extremely good or a very bad motor without knowing exactly why.
Ted: Assuming you know what wire size and number of turns will do the job in your application, I'd say technique is the all-important factor. For instance, are the windings on all three poles equal in length and number of turns? You can tell by measuring the resistance of each winding. Are the solder connections good, both physically and electrically? I use a strong acid flux and just a touch with a hot iron.
 
Pete: What about balance? For the home rewinder, static balance is the only kind possible. Is it adequate?
Ted: In most cases, yes. But in that one-in-a-hundred, only a good dynamic balance job is going to get rid of unwanted vibration.
Bud: So quit winding your own. Pete. Buy Dyna-Rewinds.
 
Pete: Will you wind me some to fit shortened 16Ds for 1/32 scale sidewinders?
Bud: Gladly. But I doubt if you could afford to pay for all that custom work.
 
Pete: Guess I'll keep winding my own unbalanced rattlers. So since I'm not a potential customer anyway, how about a few real secrets? I promise not to tell anyone but our readers. How about commutator timing? What ad­vance works best and how do you get it consistently?
Ted: This is a real problem. The tolerances in the motor itself —magnet fit, end cap fit, brush tube angle, and brush-to-brush tube clearance — are so great that you cannot get an exact amount of advance. A nominal advance of ten degrees on the armature is enough to be sure that some advance will survive all the assembly tolerances. This is the main thing.
 
Pete: It seems to me this one of the biggest drawbacks to the Mabuchi­type motor as opposed to the more precision Pittman type. It also occurs to me that here lies one of the biggest reasons why supposedly identical rewinds differ so drastically at times.
Ted: That's true. But where else can you get so much motor for so little money and with such light weight?
 
Pete: I'm convinced. If you could control all the other variables what timing do you like the best?
Ted: About ten degrees. Beyond that, you get into heating problems and start to lose brakes and torque to a noticeable degree.
 
Pete: Any benefits to say, 20 degrees advance?
Ted: A little more horsepower and a lot more heat.
 
Pete: Back to the home rewinder. Any more tips?
Ted: Armature end play should be just enough to take care of thermal expansion. And to avoid excessive thrust loads the armature should be centered axially on the magnets.
 
Pete: How about truing and polishing the commutator?
Ted: Most commutators of the molded type seem to be pretty true initially. If they are not, you can recognize it by current fluctuations with the motor running at a steady speed. Polishing the commutator is certainly a desirable thing to do.
 
Pete: There are now dozens of exotic motor lubricants on the market. Do you have a favorite?
Ted: Would you believe 3 in 1 oil?
 
Pete: Let's talk a little about using a rewind motor. We all know the im­portance of good gear mesh and free turning axles to motor life. Care to add anything to this?
Ted: When you run a rewind, you must realize that its improved perform­ance is the result of more current draw which automatically means more heat. Especially when running a car with a new motor, watch to see how hot it is. Don't keep running it indefinitely when it is very hot. If it smokes, either it is too hot or you're oiling it too heavily. Be careful. Even with all the precautions, you can melt it!
 
Pete: And of course, the lower the revs the more current the motor pulls and the hotter it gets. Certainly a good reason to build good handling cars!
Ted: Right. And don't forget that incorrect gearing can result in low revs as well as poor handling. And reduce performance, too.
 
Pete: Seems like the way to make them last is to run only high banked figure eights.
Ted: Except that here centrifugal force works against you. Ever burst a commutator?
 
Pete: Yeah. And that reminds me. Never free-rev a rewind!
Ted: One more thing which you've made quite a point of in your column, Pete. The hand controller should be matched to the motor.
 
Pete: And the track. Would you agree that a general rule would be five to ten ohms controller resistance for most rewinds?
Ted: Yes. Closer to five for the high speed tracks and I imagine you prefer ten on your postage stamp tracks.
 
Pete: Watch your language friend, or I'm going to build a scale car and come down to The Groove and wipe out those thingies you guys run!
Ted: Here's a Dyna-Rewind for you. You're welcome any Thursday night.
 

  • C. J. Bupgoo likes this
Bertil Berggren
Overseas Observer




#2 Rick Davis

Rick Davis

    Mid-Pack Racer

  • Member at Peace
  • PipPipPip
  • 120 posts
  • Joined: 05-July 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Roseville, MI, USA

Posted 24 July 2013 - 10:06 PM

Bertil, thanks for taking the time to dig this up and post, and heck even reformat it so us old blind people can read it.  :)

 

It's especially meaningful for me because I had the honor to race with and learn a tremendous amount about craftsmanship from Pete. I also became quite friendly with Ted Lech later on when I switched to 1/24 racing. In fact I bought the magnetizer mentioned in the article along with the Unimat with WW spindle that they trued comms on. FYI I still own the magnetizer and it was just a rewound large Simco.

 

Another curious fact is that Mark Parus (mark-d-shark here on Slotblog), who passed a couple of years ago, was a distant cousin to Ted Lech.


Rick Davis
1/8/??-1/11/22
Requiescat in Pace

#3 TSR

TSR

    The Dokktor is IN

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 42,304 posts
  • Joined: 02-February 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Marxifornia

Posted 25 July 2013 - 10:37 AM

I interviewed Bud Stordhal in 2008 in McMinnville, Oregon, where he has retired. He spends his days as a guide to the Evergreen Aircraft museum in that city, that hosts besides plenty of great aircraft, the Spruce Goose.
 
Bud and Ted were GM employees in the engineering department and were slot car enthusiasts who used a ceramic-filled epoxy they found at GM to coat the rewound armatures they made. It became a business with Bud running the paperwork and Ted winding the armatures and providing the technology. It started and ended in Bud's garage in the suburbs of Detroit. Unfortunately it did not end well: in 1970, Ted, who was married with children, fell in lust with a young woman who was also a drug user and possibly a dealer, went to Bud's garage where he took the cash box and the remaining winding machines and absconded, abandoning his family. Despite years of search, he never resurfaced or was found. Our friend Brad Blohm has been on his trail for many years but so far, nothing has been found.

Bud shut down Dyna-Rewind and eventually retired from General Motors to California, then Oregon.
 
Bud told me that the first motors were rewound FT36D, then they bought about 1,000 kits wholesale and these are the ones that received the 99-cent motors on an exchange basis. So far and over the years, I only have found ONE motor from these kits, a Cox TTX150 that received the treatment.

The ensuing rewinds were mostly FT16 and FT26D orange motors based on Classic CM450 and CM470 motors bought directly from Classic, then yellow FT16D obtained from K&B. When Mabuchi issued their new FT16D with the new "oval-hole" can, Bud bought directly from Mabuchi as well as new nickel-plated FT26 motors. Once Mabuchi faded and the new Mura motors came out with the modified Tradeship can, Bud bought the original Tradeship cans and Mura dark gray endbells and that was the last generation of Dyna-Rewind motors.
 
Dyna-Rewind had a racing team in which there were quite a few members receiving parts and bodies painted by Dave Bloom, but only one of the team members ever got an actual paycheck and only for one year, and this was Jerry Brady.
 
Ted Lech was somewhat of a genius in devising the Dyna-Rewind motors, but his actions and permanent disappearance show how vulnerable a person can be to influence by another person living on a different and not too appetizing outlook in life.

The new book, "Electric Dreams", will tell you a lot more.

Philippe de Lespinay


#4 SlotStox#53

SlotStox#53

    Posting Leader

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,084 posts
  • Joined: 13-March 13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:TX

Posted 25 July 2013 - 01:09 PM

Very interesting information about one of the major players. Always watch the Dyna rewinds when they surface online... remember seeing their adverts in the slot car magazines.

#5 Rick Davis

Rick Davis

    Mid-Pack Racer

  • Member at Peace
  • PipPipPip
  • 120 posts
  • Joined: 05-July 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Roseville, MI, USA

Posted 25 July 2013 - 02:18 PM

Quote

Bud and Ted were GM employees in the engineering department.


Not sure where Jerry Mrlik fit into the equation. 
 

Quote

Dyna-Rewind had a racing team in which there were quite a few members receiving parts and bodies painted by Dave Bloom, but only one of the team members ever got an actual paycheck and only for one year, and this was Jerry Brady.


Remember the "Greenaway Dyna Armatures" being a running joke.
 
You mean the few hundred I gave Ted for the Unimat and Simco might have gone in his pocket.  :) :)  

Rick Davis
Rick Davis
1/8/??-1/11/22
Requiescat in Pace

#6 TSR

TSR

    The Dokktor is IN

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 42,304 posts
  • Joined: 02-February 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Marxifornia

Posted 25 July 2013 - 04:03 PM

Hi Rick,
 
One for you:  :)
 
rick-davis-louisianagp-1970-2003_800.jpg
 
 

Quote

Not sure where Jerry Mrlik fit into the equation.

 
Jerry, another GM R&D employee and one who worked on the Chaparral projects, was of course a friend of both Bud and Ted, but had nothing to do with Dyna-Rewind, other than he used the motors for his own cars, of which this one survived in pretty good condition (pictures courtesy Edo the Kingee):
 
jerry_mrlik_lola_1.jpg
 
jerry_mrlik_lola_2.jpg
 
The chassis was built by Jerry, the body also painted by Jerry and the motor is of course a Dyna-Rewind modified Classic CM470... :)


  • Jencar17 and S.O. Watt like this

Philippe de Lespinay


#7 Bob Appelle

Bob Appelle

    On The Lead Lap

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 254 posts
  • Joined: 07-December 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington, MI

Posted 25 July 2013 - 05:10 PM

I was lucky enough to drive on the Dyna Rewind team, running enduros in Ohio for for one winter. We did very well, but just kicked butt on the high banked figure eight at Parma running Johan 1/24 Toronado hardbodies.  

It was Jerry Mrlix and Dave Corbin (also a GM person), can't remember the third member, and myself. All I did was drive, everyone was twenty years older than me. It was just a stroke of luck on my part that they asked me, but it sure was fun.
  • TSR likes this
Hemi Bob

#8 ravajack

ravajack

    Race Leader

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 572 posts
  • Joined: 17-February 06
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 31 July 2016 - 02:46 AM

Recent postings in another topic led me to try to drill a bit further in the story of Dyna-Rewind .

 

This is what emerged from the depths of the Net, somewhat clearing things up but also a bit sad postlude to Bud & Ted's Excellent Adventure:

 

Dyna-Rewind aftermath

 

The blogger Julie appears to be one of  Dyna-Rewind founder Ted Lech's three children, all of whom where orphanaged when their father rather abruptly left his family and disappeared.

 

dads-slot-car.jpg

 

"Dad's Slot Car"


  • Jencar17, Samiam and Jesse Gonzales like this
Bertil Berggren
Overseas Observer

#9 tonyp

tonyp

    Grand Champion Poster

  • Member at Peace
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,325 posts
  • Joined: 12-February 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sanford, FL, land of lizards and big roaches

Posted 31 July 2016 - 10:59 AM

Rick,

 

I doubt Jerry Brady ever had a Dyna armature in his car. Every one I ever saw was a Greenaway. The Dyna rewind name on his bodies was as close as he got to running their stuff. Nice paid gig if you can get it.


Anthony 'Tonyp' Przybylowicz

5/28/50-12/20/21
Requiescat in Pace


#10 Uncle Fred

Uncle Fred

    Checkered Flag in Hand

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,368 posts
  • Joined: 29-September 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Northlake, TX

Posted 01 August 2016 - 11:03 AM

I too raced for Dyna-Rewind. As PDL said I was not paid just received free motors to race through Charlie Harris.  I did meet Bud when I won the Dyna-Wind race at Glen Oaks in NY in 1967.


Fred Correnti

#11 Jesse Gonzales

Jesse Gonzales

    Race Leader

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 639 posts
  • Joined: 27-July 17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:AZ

Posted 05 March 2018 - 06:47 PM

Read good stuff on Ted and his family on the link Bertil posted above, sad but it's all too often life.

Ted Lech
 
Jess Gonzales
  • Half Fast likes this

#12 Half Fast

Half Fast

    Keeper Of Odd Knowledge

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,628 posts
  • Joined: 02-May 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NYC, Long Island

Posted 05 March 2018 - 09:00 PM

Interesting, an all too human and sad story.
 
That winding machine looks like it came from Alexander Graham Bell's laboratory,
 
Cheers,

Bill Botjer

Faster then, wiser now.

The most dangerous form of ignorance is not knowing that you don't know anything!

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity

 

 

 
 

#13 TSR

TSR

    The Dokktor is IN

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 42,304 posts
  • Joined: 02-February 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Marxifornia

Posted 05 March 2018 - 11:04 PM

Since I talked to her, her brother passed away.

Her story is not 100% correct, as my interview with Bud Stordahl offers contradictions, but I balanced both sides as it is normal for a teen to not remember things as clearly as an older person who ran the business.

Philippe de Lespinay






Electric Dreams Online Shop