Mark, I proposed the same thing to the board two days ago. This was Hershman's idea way back when the JK kit first came out. Start a chassis kit class with the Warmack, JK and any other kit that came out and met the kit rules. The board didn't want anything to do with it.Maybe a good compromise might be, remove the kits from Can am,GTC & F-1, Clarify chassis requirements. put the kits together in a spec kit class,instead of having the exclusive JK spec class.
Slick 7
#326
Posted 18 February 2009 - 04:00 PM
Jim "Butch" Dunaway
I don't always go the extra mile, but when I do it's because I missed my exit.
All my life I've strived to keep from becoming a millionaire, so far I've succeeded.
There are three kinds of people in the world, those that are good at math and those that aren't.
No matter how big of a hammer you use, you can't pound common sense into stupid people, believe me, I've tried.
#327
Posted 18 February 2009 - 04:03 PM
#328
Posted 18 February 2009 - 04:06 PM
Anthony 'Tonyp' Przybylowicz
5/28/50-12/20/21
Requiescat in Pace
#329
Posted 18 February 2009 - 04:13 PM
Stop the insanity. The pre-allowed kits were good for the growth of this aspect of the hobby because they still required scratchbuilding. You couldn't just snap/key them together.
"RETRO is a Scratch builders class, it is not for everyone, it is not designed to save slot car racing, it is not about modern technology, it is a scratch builders class."
Joe "Noose" Neumeister
Sometimes known as a serial despoiler of the clear purity of virgin Lexan bodies. Lexan is my canvas!
Noose Custom Painting - Since 1967
Chairman - IRRA® Body Committee - Roving IRRA® Tech Dude - "EVIL BUCKS Painter"
"Team Evil Bucks" Racer - 2016 Caribbean Retro Overall Champion
The only thing bad about Retro is admitting that you remember doing it originally.
#330
Posted 18 February 2009 - 04:28 PM
Its all a matter of maintaining balance.These kits lend themselves to modification and design improvements that can be rewarding, and scratchbuilt frames seem to be run about the same lap times.
When i first saw the S7 i realized that this was a game changer and i thought that it would be a must have. The other kits are different and should be dealt with differently.I think that keeping things working is in the discretion of the people in charge.
I always like to tune in to Slotblog and see what the lastest drama is.It's FUN
#331
Posted 18 February 2009 - 04:44 PM
"We were there
We know
It ain't Retro"
Send all orders to Retro-R-Us
Joe "Noose" Neumeister
Sometimes known as a serial despoiler of the clear purity of virgin Lexan bodies. Lexan is my canvas!
Noose Custom Painting - Since 1967
Chairman - IRRA® Body Committee - Roving IRRA® Tech Dude - "EVIL BUCKS Painter"
"Team Evil Bucks" Racer - 2016 Caribbean Retro Overall Champion
The only thing bad about Retro is admitting that you remember doing it originally.
#332
Posted 18 February 2009 - 04:45 PM
Everyone is free to do whatever they want, and no one ever pretended that retro racing, that DOES involve building your own car as its basic philiosophy in the style of mid-1960's machinery, is for everyone.Some want anyone and everyone to be able to put a car together, regardless of their building skills. Not everyone shares that opinion.
In other words, if you want to join the fun, it might be wise to learn from the very willing free teachers out there, how to do it. And it is certainly not rocket science.
It is regretable that those 28 years of lazy-picking ready-to-race Flexi chassis over the counter have so damaged the ability of so many dedicated slot racers to build their own chassis using basic materials and solder.
When we began D3 in California in May 2006, it was specifically for the purpose of BUILDING vintage-style chassis and enjoying racing them. At the same time, some newcomers and younger people simply could not build, and acquired chassis or cars from others who could. Some took the time to learn and after a while, built their own. Others still purchase what they need to this day. But MOST are slowly learning things they never knew before, things that Flexi racing never taught them.
Philippe de Lespinay
#333
Posted 18 February 2009 - 04:48 PM
Jim "Butch" Dunaway
I don't always go the extra mile, but when I do it's because I missed my exit.
All my life I've strived to keep from becoming a millionaire, so far I've succeeded.
There are three kinds of people in the world, those that are good at math and those that aren't.
No matter how big of a hammer you use, you can't pound common sense into stupid people, believe me, I've tried.
#334
Posted 18 February 2009 - 05:14 PM
Not having to spend hours & bucks looking for more horsepower means much more time for chassis building.
Define a chassis or kit however you want...but even building the Slick 7 would be way more fun & slotcarly educational than wasting time with motors.
Thanks, Todd
Jim Honeycutt
"I don't think I'm ever more 'aware' than I am right after I hit my thumb with a hammer." - Jack Handey [Deep Thoughts]
#335
Posted 18 February 2009 - 05:25 PM
When we began D3 in California in May 2006,
For the sake of correctness and completeness, D3 began in January of 2007.
What came before that in SoCal was not called D3.
The CanAm class was called either "Nostalgia CanAm" or "Retro CanAm" depending on which version of the rules you look at.
The F1 class was based on what had been called "Vintage Spirit F1" by the Vintage Hardbody NASCAR guys who had been running them before the CanAm racing started up.
The first set of formal rules for CanAm are titled "Rules for "Retro" CanAm class racing", dated 7/31/2006. This initial set of rules was arranged in a table format that was re-written on 8/1/2006 into a no-tables format that formed the basis of the first web-published set of rules.
The second version is titled "Rules for 1/24 Nostalgia Can-Am class racing" and dated 9/3/2006.
#336
Posted 18 February 2009 - 05:27 PM
Exactly my thoughts, although if you can build a decent car for any of the USRA classes, it shouldn't be that much of a leap to build a chassis from scratch. You just may have to build more than one to get the hang of it. Back in "the day" it would be months before you could see what everyone else was doing, and most probably weren't too keen on sharing there latest ideas. With the internet, and specifically slotblog, you see what the latest winning chassis are sometimes in a matter of hours. And everyone seems to be more than happy to share ideas and give helpful tips.
As they say, this too shall pass. But the subject obviously needed to be discussed, judging by the number of posts here.
#337
Posted 18 February 2009 - 05:48 PM
Indeed, I was merely speaking of the date of the actual first race, in mid-May 2006. There were actually EIGHT monthly races before the official name of "D3" was used for the new series from January 2007, but it remains that we are talking of the same animal here.When we began D3 in California in May 2006...
For the sake of correctness and completeness, D3 began in January of 2007.
Exactly!Exactly my thoughts, although if you can build a decent car for any of the USRA classes, it shouldn't be that much of a leap to build a chassis from scratch.
And indeed, today everyone is pretty much open to share their ideas, so it is not that difficult to see what works, so as not to waste any time.
Philippe de Lespinay
#338
Posted 18 February 2009 - 08:15 PM
Mike Katz
Scratchbuilts forever!!
#339
Posted 18 February 2009 - 08:42 PM
The nice thing about club racing, they don't have to let anything in that they feel is outside of their intent of their rules. If they say tomorrow, we all have to run O/S Lola's painted dark grey, so be it. Comply or don't race.
99% grasp the intent, the 1% will have to watch from the outside..............
Rick Bennardo
"Professional Tinkerer"
scrgeo@comcast.net
R-Geo Products
LIKE my Facebook page for updates, new releases, and sales: Rgeo Slots...
Lead! The easy equalizer...
#340
Posted 18 February 2009 - 09:25 PM
Joe "Noose" Neumeister
Sometimes known as a serial despoiler of the clear purity of virgin Lexan bodies. Lexan is my canvas!
Noose Custom Painting - Since 1967
Chairman - IRRA® Body Committee - Roving IRRA® Tech Dude - "EVIL BUCKS Painter"
"Team Evil Bucks" Racer - 2016 Caribbean Retro Overall Champion
The only thing bad about Retro is admitting that you remember doing it originally.
#341 Mark Greene
Posted 18 February 2009 - 10:13 PM
OK but say I sell all the parts..pans, axle tubes, drop arm/guide tongue piece, in a package and don't call it a kit. Maybe I have K&S make up the bags of the stuff. It's not a kit. It's a chassis parts bag. You could make one chassis out it or you could take it and use the parts on several chassis. Maybe I'll throw in some piano wire and brass tubing. No instructions. Nope you are on your own. Sell it on the K&S rack.
Stop the insanity. The pre-allowed kits were good for the growth of this aspect of the hobby because they still required scratchbuilding. You couldn't just snap/key them together.
"RETRO is a Scratch builders class, it is not for everyone, it is not designed to save slot car racing, it is not about modern technology, it is a scratch builders class."
Noose, I'm gonna take issue with one more thing you keep saying about this chassis. Snap/key it together. I'm sure you realize it will take more then that??? Bondo it together,LOL even super glue, guess what, first crash it will be in pieces all over the track!LOL! It will need soldered together. It will also need dremeled and some parts will have to be sanded and fiddled with to get them to fit.You haven't built many of the cut cars have you?
Will it take less work then doing a car from scratch, sure will, but that is what kits of all kinds do.It will also take all the skills you use to build one of your chassis's, just not as much of them.
I'm not for or against the kits, that's up to you guys, but let's atleast be realistic and leave the drama to the soap opera's.
#342
Posted 18 February 2009 - 10:24 PM
#343 Mark Greene
Posted 18 February 2009 - 10:25 PM
After along afternoon/evening of thinking on the subject, I'm 100% with TonyP. Toss all the kit cars to a kit class, Dump JkSpec incorperate it into the kit class. Flexi's? They are out of retro altogeter aren't they?
Of course Can am,GTC and F-1 go pure scratch built. After all retro is scratch building......
#344
Posted 18 February 2009 - 10:30 PM
#345
Posted 18 February 2009 - 10:47 PM
Is there anything wrong with your I-pod?
Philippe de Lespinay
#346 Mark Greene
Posted 18 February 2009 - 10:50 PM
Got anything relevant.
#347
Posted 18 February 2009 - 10:51 PM
to race with me?
It looks like a lot of fun to me, does it look like a D3 no, but so what I still will have fun with it.
Nesta
Nesta Szabo
In this bright future you can't forget your past.
BMW (Bob Marley and the Wailers)
United we stand and divided we fall, the Legends are complete.
I'm racing the best here at BP but Father time is much better then all of us united.
Not a snob in this hobby, after all it will be gone, if we keep on going like we do, and I have nothing to prove so I keep on posting because I have nothing to gain.
It's our duty to remember the past so we can have a future.
Pistol Pete you will always be in my memory.
#348
Posted 18 February 2009 - 10:52 PM
Philippe de Lespinay
#349 Mark Greene
Posted 18 February 2009 - 10:59 PM
I think Dave is a student of Larry Mattingly.
I hear they are best of friends!
#350
Posted 18 February 2009 - 11:07 PM