Hershman is the Man
#76
Posted 17 March 2012 - 06:07 PM
Racing can be as cheap or as expensive as you make it, just like everything else you might do as a pastime.
#77
Posted 17 March 2012 - 07:43 PM
Simple solution.............
Use Hand out P-S PD motors are all IRRA Premier events.
Each day, each class racers have to buy new hand out motors for the class that day. If a racer finds a "good one" well he gets to use it only in the class/day he pulled the motor. Next day.....luck of the draw will be on.
Everyone is the same boat...... everyone has the same luck pulling a motor.
No need to worry about air gaps, timing, magnet strength, reforming brush hoods, sending out arms for custom balancing and whatever points have been brought up here.
No one has to worry about motors leaving the raceway as they will be handed out on race morning installed, practiced and then tech'ed and impounded.
How many of you here and have posted and also race at IRRA Premier events would go along with this proposal?
Oh my...
Ron and I have discussed 'hand-out' Pro Slot motors several times. In fact, you may see it tried in the very near future. It is the only fair way to end 'perception'. And, as I have stated MANY times... perception is reality. My vote is YES for handout PS motors.
Requiring Ron to run Pro Slot refurbs is absurd. Should he also be required to race Parma bodies instead of O/S shells? The guy is in the motor and body business. Why would he use the products/services of a competitor.
Another point is the fact that no one is beating down the doors to do the refurb service. If Ron should decide to quit, there will only be one. Will this lead to more perception?
Spec tires... Everyone knows my feeling on the issue...
#78 Little Willy
Posted 17 March 2012 - 07:53 PM
#79
Posted 17 March 2012 - 08:00 PM
i dont race retro and dont know much about it but it seems to me you could have every one submit a legal sealed motor at the tech table. then number each motor and every one draw a number and thats the motor they run in the race. chances are you wont draw your own motor so if you cheated some one else would benefit. then at the end of the race every one gets their own motor back
That is a great solution! Anybody else?
My life fades, the vison dims. All that remains are memories... from The Road Warrior
#80
Posted 17 March 2012 - 08:17 PM
That is a great solution! Anybody else?
How about every IRRA racer sends in a brand new PD motor in the bag to the IRRA or just mail in 48.00 to IRRA
This should bring in/purchase 100 plus motors.
All are "refurbed" and sealed by Fast Ones or Pro-Slot.
The IRRA numbers all the motors and when you show up at a IRRA Premier event...each racer picks a motor out of the "motor pool" and uses that motor for the day...... at the end of the day the motors are returned and re picked/used the next day.
At the end of the event, all used motors in the course of a weekend are refurbed and freshened up for the next Premier race.
The motors are the property of the IRRA
#81
Posted 17 March 2012 - 09:16 PM
I want to know the effect of "animated pectrons" on said donkey.And would the seal control the decay of "dissiapted flotrons" on the negative terminal of motors.One donkey may have a higher metabolism rate than another. How would a seal affect that?
Team Trend
#82
Posted 17 March 2012 - 09:28 PM
Seem's to me the real issue at hand is that a lot of us would like to have Ron's skillset when it come's to driving, I know I would, I mean, really, if you had the fastest best handling hot-rod on the track and fell off 8 times " once each lane" per segment, what is more detrimental ? falling off those 8 times or not falling off and running a tenth slower the entire race? which scenario would net you a higher lap total ? I would much rather have a "blueprinted" driver's skillset than any blueprinted motor, driving has alway's won the race's not drag racing down the straightaway.
I would be heavily opposed to a spec tire.
I would also oppose sending the IRRA another $48 to choose a random PD motor that I wouldn't own, being that I couldn't even afford an extra $10 for an additional FK motor at the R4/5.
I make tire's a lot because that afford's me the only economical way to do it for the time being, making tire's suck's, I wish I had the extra cash just to buy what I wanted and as much as I wanted. It is without a doubt a tuning tool for the car's we run also.
You want to control perception with all of it ? take a page out of bracket racing and institute a breakout time that is just a "hair" slower than the fastest lap's that are being "driven" at a particular racetrack. Oh, I forgot, we want to go faster dont we ;-)
Build it, Race it, Break it, Fix it !
Don't Outsmart Common Sense !
#83
Posted 17 March 2012 - 09:46 PM
That is a great solution! Anybody else?
If we have the preception of having this many problems running sealed motors, run unsealed motors. Then everyone will only think everybody else is cheating.
I intend to live forever! So far, so good.
#84
Posted 17 March 2012 - 10:08 PM
"Waddaya mean, it won't pass tech?"
Hugh Dudley
#85
Posted 17 March 2012 - 10:16 PM
People would say he was running special belts.Simple..............just make Ron race a Whisper Jet car next year.......but...he would still kick booty. I can't believe this discussion is still going on.....
I intend to live forever! So far, so good.
#86
Posted 17 March 2012 - 10:18 PM
Philippe de Lespinay
#87
Posted 17 March 2012 - 10:22 PM
Ray Carlisi
#88
Posted 17 March 2012 - 10:24 PM
If this keeps up, it wouldn't surprise me one bit if Ron does decide to retire from racing. I bet that some of you tools would love to see that.
So come on boys, keep the bitchfest going!!! You'll soon have one less thing to worry about.
#89
Posted 17 March 2012 - 10:26 PM
Ray Carlisi
#90
Posted 17 March 2012 - 10:38 PM
You'll soon have one less thing to worry about.
Forrest Gump: Lieutenant Dan got me invested in some kind of fruit company. So then I got a call from him, saying we don't have to worry about money no more. And I said, that's good! One less thing."
Does it come with the money?
#91
Posted 17 March 2012 - 11:23 PM
aI want to know the effect of "animated pectrons" on said donkey.And would the seal control the decay of "dissiapted flotrons" on the negative terminal of motors.
Shhhh! Dan may hear and come running looking for an original Bolton Quik Suk.
But in all seriousness, as a guy getting back into the building and tuning of these kool kars, plus wanting to travel to some races in the not too distant future, Ron's idea would be great for me (and others), one less thing I gotta spend time and money on.
I would only need to invest in maybe 6 or so motors, enough to fill the motor boxes in the cars I would bring. One hassle gone, as I don't want another motor program thing. Just what many have said something about.
Not bad fodder.
Tom Hansen
Our Gang Racing Team
Cukras Enterprises
Team Camen
Chassis By Hansen
I race and shop at Pacific Slot Car Raceway
#92
Posted 17 March 2012 - 11:39 PM
Rick Bennardo
"Professional Tinkerer"
scrgeo@comcast.net
R-Geo Products
LIKE my Facebook page for updates, new releases, and sales: Rgeo Slots...
Lead! The easy equalizer...
#93
Posted 18 March 2012 - 12:07 AM
I doubt it ...LOL
It's closer to becoming a reality than you know.
#94
Posted 18 March 2012 - 06:22 AM
#95
Posted 18 March 2012 - 09:34 AM
#96
Posted 18 March 2012 - 11:14 AM
#97
Posted 18 March 2012 - 12:09 PM
#98
Posted 18 March 2012 - 12:51 PM
#99
Posted 18 March 2012 - 12:51 PM
There is no problem with Ron running his own bodies because every other racer can do the same thing. There is nothing wrong with Ron running tires that he assembled because every other racer can do the same thing. There is ,however, something wrong with Ron running motors that he rebuilt because no other racer can do the same thing.
--Except--
Freddie, in the very next statement you detailed the work you--a not-Ron human and therefore in the "no other" category--do to prep your motors; from which it should follow, that "every other racer" could do this, if they choose.
I get the sense that most of the flap here is from the guys who choose not to learn motor skills, and want to even out the field in their perception. But it ain't level in the best of circumstances! We scream about a bump on the green, while kicking up our own divots.
What we miss considering here is just how many ways a slot car can go right, or go wrong--we can build well or superbly, but we're building by hand with variously reliable materials. Our best work and prep will still land up somewhere on the scale from molecular perfection up to gross hacksaw butchery. It's chaos soup from an engineering standpoint, no matter how your car's built and prepped.
Best you can hope for is a provisional, conditional path through the chaos with enough kinetic energy left over to be that much faster than the other guy.
If we are aware, we will understand that and take responsibility. Most of us aren't aware, not all the time, and we forget about it in our rush to the race. --Where we see somebody with the appearance of Perfection in a place we are aware we lack it! Suddenly, that lump looms way large.
We're all talking about a perceived unevenness here, like somehow that'll forgive our own complicity. Never did; won't. We just argue that way.
Because we choose to.
Duffy
1950-2016
Requiescat in Pace
And I am awaiting
perpetually and forever
a renaissance of wonder
#100
Posted 18 March 2012 - 01:08 PM
1. Matt, I agree, they should have prevented this from happening. BUT, guess who the IRRA Motor guy is :
Motors Committee: chair - Ron Hershman
You guessed it: Ron Hershman
2. The IRRA BOD keeps saying they want to keep the playing field level and provide affordable racing by using sealed motors.
BUT, guess what ? WE WANT TO WORK ON MOTORS !!!!!!!!!
Paul Wolcott