Thingies: what were they all about?
#301
Posted 04 January 2012 - 10:32 AM
an be made or gotten from rick. Will post pic later
11/4/49-1/23/15
Requiescat in Pace
#302
Posted 04 January 2012 - 10:35 AM
Anyone needing it give me a part# and color name.
http://www.tamiya.co...cts/archive.htm
The helpful salesperson did not see lime green metallic on the rack.
Bob Israelite
#303
Posted 04 January 2012 - 06:17 PM
Here is a pic of the color I was looking for, lime green metalic, maybe they don't make it anymore? Didn't see it on their web site?
Also, on a side note...these two bodies are "scale 1/24" bodies? they do fit on and Intl.32 chassis you had mentioned them in another tread
i-ray
PS someone asked about this body style in 1/32 scale, mini/womp/Intl.32- Supercuc series, plus another 3 in 1/24 scale
one was done in the lime green too.
#304
Posted 04 January 2012 - 07:04 PM
#305
Posted 04 January 2012 - 07:05 PM
Oh and while Im at it I should mention I got the Choti body from "George and Pearl" out of Oz. He sent it on the condition I build it 3 years ago, so I hope to make him proud.
#306
Posted 04 January 2012 - 10:23 PM
Hey Bro-Rob,
Here is a pic of the color I was looking for, lime green metalic, maybe they don't make it anymore? Didn't see it on their web site?
Ray:
Have you seen the Testors lacquer Citrus Yellow Metalic? I believe it's similar to what you're looking for?
http://www.testors.c...136964/Lacquers
#307
Posted 04 January 2012 - 11:42 PM
Glenn, just funnin...we all are staying friends, I think? Stress sucks... get some takeout tonight..relax
Bro-Noda, the color Rob posted looks real close. Tonights short track race was postponed last minute till next Wed. so I didn't get to Hobby Town but now I know what you are looking for so I'll check when I go there. You have so many freaking cool bodies to chose from
Rob, Testors lists Go Mango as a Ford color calm down dude.
Bob Israelite
#308
Posted 05 January 2012 - 08:59 AM
Thanks man, I'm sure noda will vac you up some Thingies inexchange for some paint
i-ray
#309
Posted 05 January 2012 - 11:00 AM
Build on guys, all the chassis look interesting. And with some of the winds you guys are talking about they should be a real handful to drive.
MR
"... a good and wholesome thing is a little harmless fun in this world; it tones a body up and keeps him human and prevents him from souring." - Mark Twain
#311
Posted 06 January 2012 - 09:15 PM
#312
Posted 06 January 2012 - 09:45 PM
I like this chassis, do you have any idea who built it?
Bill,
no idea but it was obviously one of those Norcal racers, and it is very likely that the added aerodynamic appendage was added later, possibly as late as 1971 when these became popular in open-class racing. Scott got the car from the auction and it is now in the LASCM in a drawer where I hide it from view until I can go through it and bring it back to what it was in the first place.
Philippe de Lespinay
#313
Posted 07 January 2012 - 11:11 AM
...and a question for Philippe: what kind of rules or restrictions would you think are appropriate for this thingie race? I have no idea what was current in 1970 so I would like to stay out of the gray area if possible. Thanks.
#314
Posted 07 January 2012 - 12:50 PM
It is none of my business of course.
Assuming that I had any say, I would try to restrict the parts used for this to original or replicas of pre-1970 slot cars, because frankly, the "thingie" movement was very brief, very limited and plenty fascinating just the way it was and there was none of it left in 1970.
Now would I allow "new" thingie bodies? Sure! What I would not allow are "wing car" bodies from pro racing painted to mimic "thingies", because they in my opinion have no place in this.
As far as motors, I would only allow Mabuchi-based motors (again because no thingie ever used anything else made after the FT16, 26 and 36 series) and try to avoid the use of modern 16D stuff that is simply out of place here. Parts and motors are cheap enough...
As far as chassis, I would limit technology to what was that of pre-1970. I remember driving one of these cars I believe last year in one of the proxy events, and it easily was the fastest, best handling car there, but it was effectively a modern Eurosport, simply constructed from steel wire instead of laser-cut steel. So basically the builder followed the letter of the rules but ceertainly not the spirit.
It is a bit of a difficult issue, we have similar issues in D3 racing where somne racers are trying to push the envelope and burst it, which can only be damaging the whole process.
'Again, I must repeat that this is simply MY opinion and should have no bearing on what the gentlemen organizing this event are accomplishing, something that I greatly encourage and wish I had time to get involved in building such a car.
Philippe de Lespinay
#315
Posted 07 January 2012 - 11:57 PM
#316
Posted 08 January 2012 - 01:27 AM
BTW: what is a #343?
Bob Israelite
#317
Posted 08 January 2012 - 09:36 AM
As far as motors, I would only allow Mabuchi-based motors (again because no thingie ever used anything else made after the FT16, 26 and 36 series) and try to avoid the use of modern 16D stuff that is simply out of place here. Parts and motors are cheap enough...
I agree Philippe. I've seen people say they have a hard time sourcing motor cores or NOS Mabuchis, but they don't seem that rare, and with a such a light car they should provide for plenty of excitement. While I just want to "get along" and have no trouble agreeing with the majority, I also really don't see the point in allowing modern 16D parts. That blows the whole concept out of the water.
As far as chassis, I would limit technology to what was that of pre-1970. I remember driving one of these cars I believe last year in one of the proxy events, and it easily was the fastest, best handling car there, but it was effectively a modern Eurosport, simply constructed from steel wire instead of laser-cut steel. So basically the builder followed the letter of the rules but ceertainly not the spirit.
Yep...still, I'm going to wait and see what others do (and how much complaining any particular chassis design generates), before I make something up. At least the "inline" rule puts a fair limit on things.
'Again, I must repeat that this is simply MY opinion and should have no bearing on what the gentlemen organizing this event are accomplishing, something that I greatly encourage and wish I had time to get involved in building such a car.
Speaking only for myself, I would LOVE to see what you might come up with and hope you manage to put something together even though you don't see having the time right now. For me, these Proxy events really have nothing to do with "winning"...but more with recreating (at least somewhat) a bit of Slot Car History. You are after all a "historic figure" in slots
-john
#318
Posted 08 January 2012 - 09:57 AM
The truth is that while the organized events may have disappeared by 1970, the cars sure didn't. They seem to keep popping up on eBay! The cars still existed in the hearts and minds of the racers as it was only a couple years later. So the premis of this series is that a teen is standing in the local 'still existing' hobby shop after reading a flyer announcing a new Thingie event with little to no rules and a pocket full of paper route money during the Summer of 1970!
If you were that kid back then.... how would you proceed?
You most certainly would buy the best motor available.
You would search out the best AJS, Dynamic, U-Go tires on the wall and head home to fire up the iron.
1970 was before added on wings became the norm but Mura had introduced the new brush hardware that totally eliminated the melted endbell. In fact, Mura now had, by '70, a new endbell for the "D" can motor.
Nobody is saying that builders cannot use pre 1969 technology. If John and others love the ol'Mabuchi motors, then "Go for it!"
Edit: Philippe, Bryan Warmack currently has my Mule in his possession for testing. I believe he plans on running it at Buena Park prior to the next D3 race. You are welcome to give it a try too. The car was built in the spirit of 1970.
Jairus H Watson - Artist
Need something painted, soldered, carved, or killed? - jairuswtsn@aol.com
www.slotcarsmag.com
www.jairuswatson.net
http://www.ratholecustoms.com
Check out some of the cool stuff on my Fotki!
#319
Posted 08 January 2012 - 11:48 AM
How long of a series is this supposed to be? I have a bunch of arms I've tested and any of them seems at least feasible depnding on how long these cars might run. For sure, a shorter series (2 or 3 tracks) would favor a hotter motor.
-john
#320
Posted 08 January 2012 - 12:27 PM
One race would make the motors grenades, but adding a second track adds a level of longevity to the mix.
Jairus H Watson - Artist
Need something painted, soldered, carved, or killed? - jairuswtsn@aol.com
www.slotcarsmag.com
www.jairuswatson.net
http://www.ratholecustoms.com
Check out some of the cool stuff on my Fotki!
#321
Posted 08 January 2012 - 01:42 PM
The truth is that while the organized events may have disappeared by 1970, the cars sure didn't. They seem to keep popping up on eBay! The cars still existed in the hearts and minds of the racers as it was only a couple years later. So the premis of this series is that a teen is standing in the local 'still existing' hobby shop after reading a flyer announcing a new Thingie event with little to no rules and a pocket full of paper route money during the Summer of 1970!
If you were that kid back then.... how would you proceed?
Youre so right Jairus. We were still having "open comp" races as late as September 1969. So if i was lucky enough to be back in that day....
1" or 1-1/4" brass drop arm
brass floppies
piano wire main rails, perhaps 3
jet flag
Riggen grey for qualifying, orange for the race
smallest orings available for front wheels
mura pink, depending on the race length, 25 single or 27-28 double, I dont remember if mura made 26's, list price a whopping $20!
motor mounted can drive, soldered to the bracket
shunted brushes
choti with one wing made from lexan
and NO GLUE!
3" max width, 1/16 clearance, both seriously enforced!
And Bob, I hear tell the 343 bracket is for a GE motor. I bought it thinking it would fit a 16-d
#322
Posted 08 January 2012 - 02:52 PM
i will ask Bryan for the car and will test it and report. Some of last year's cars were really good.
Philippe de Lespinay
#323
Posted 08 January 2012 - 03:41 PM
Some of last year's cars were really good.
I guess they really are last year's cars now, but the series continues into 2012 with a few more races yet to run. I wonder what wonders will comprise this year's cars???
ATB
Al.
#324
Posted 08 January 2012 - 06:37 PM
Very cool....looking forward to the feedback from Brian and Philippe.
Drop the plow and whip that Mule... the first row is the hardest to make straight, all others will follow.
Bob Israelite
#325
Posted 08 January 2012 - 06:39 PM
I guess they really are last year's cars now, but the series continues into 2012 with a few more races yet to run. I wonder what wonders will comprise this year's cars???
ATB
Al.
As I remember in sixtee-nine, an inline built with all the angle-winder tricks,even plummer, could pound a lot of cars into the ground! We had it on aerodynamics.
Im really liking this thread, as before this, I thot I was the only one to run an inline thingie in open comp. And then there was that whole debate about drop arms.......