Jump to content




Photo

Arm winding #2


  • Please log in to reply
334 replies to this topic

#101 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 14 October 2013 - 07:13 PM

OK John.  I got the first one done.  200 turns of #35 reads around .2 ohm...hard to get an exact reading as my meter is hooked up to a jig that fits "normal sized" arms.  Does that sound in the ballpark?

 

-john


John Havlicek




#102 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 15 October 2013 - 07:10 AM

BTW...THANKS Tom!

 

-john


John Havlicek

#103 sidejobjon

sidejobjon

    On The Lead Lap

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Joined: 24-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NJ

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:50 AM

OK John.  I got the first one done.  200 turns of #35 reads around .2 ohm...hard to get an exact reading as my meter is hooked up to a jig that fits "normal sized" arms.  Does that sound in the ballpark?

 

-john

John,

Stock Tjet arms are about 16. ohms some hot drag arms 2.2. Super II quadurlams were 4.0 per pole. But i am not a pro someone can chime in.

SJJ


John Falzarano

#104 sidejobjon

sidejobjon

    On The Lead Lap

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Joined: 24-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NJ

Posted 16 October 2013 - 11:13 AM

John,

What if you check some of the extras i sent, see if its the tester? But at same time not sure if they were any good.

SJJ


John Falzarano

#105 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 16 October 2013 - 03:22 PM

Hi John,

 

     I did a better job of testing the arm today.  Two poles read 2.59-2.60 ohms and one pole reads 2.60-2.61 ohms.  I'm actually kind of surprised the poles are that consistent, because 200T of such thin wire is a fairly messy job.  Anyway, my tester is definitely good, and I tested a couple of the other arms you sent...one read between 6.90 and 7.35 ohms (depending on the pole) and the other varied a bit more, reading between 7.80 and 8.43 ohms.  

 

     The recipe from that old article sure makes for a spicy meatball (!?).  I hope you have some good magnets!

 

-john

 

PS...I had the range setting off for the first test.  Upon redoing it, I noticed I was getting negative numbers :), so I increased the range 10X.  I also cleaned the com off with Scotchbrite this time before testing.  Still seems like a relatively hot arm for these things compared to the stock examples I have here.  Here's a shot of the thing...like I said, it's pretty danged messy but seems to meter OK:

a88ec698-5399-4ca7-924c-c0b04f117fa4_zps


John Havlicek

#106 sidejobjon

sidejobjon

    On The Lead Lap

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Joined: 24-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NJ

Posted 16 October 2013 - 06:15 PM

John,
You are the master Looks unreal is it balanced? looks Vintage, i hope you enjoyed this piece of history. What will the 125 wind ohm at?
Thank for Helping
SJJ
John Falzarano

#107 sidejobjon

sidejobjon

    On The Lead Lap

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Joined: 24-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NJ

Posted 16 October 2013 - 06:31 PM

John,
Do you think this will need Epoxy? This is one hot little number. Wow I am so ecstatic. I do have some hot Mags & a sweet Noose body.
Thanks Again
SJJ
John Falzarano

#108 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 16 October 2013 - 07:04 PM

Hi John,

 

     The arm blank was coated and the coils were epoxied.  The wire ends have been soldered with 5% silver solder...and I have no idea if the thing will work :)  The rest is up to you, but I have a question.  The article says he did a second arm with only around 125 Turns of the same wire as a drag arm and you asked for that one too...that sounds like it's going to be PDH (pretty danged hot)...you still want that?

 

-john

 

PS...I have no way of balancing this thing, even static balancing.  Maybe you have a source for that?

PPS...I just saw your message and will do you up the 125 as well.


John Havlicek

#109 SlotStox#53

SlotStox#53

    Posting Leader

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,843 posts
  • Joined: 13-March 13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:TX

Posted 16 October 2013 - 07:50 PM

Hats off to you John ! :shok: That is just beauty in miniature ! :good: great job.



#110 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 19 October 2013 - 03:16 PM

Another one for John.  This time I used the stock arm, meaning I took it apart and put it back together again.  Like #1, I also powder coated the existing stack after cleaning it all up and did another 200T of #35 wire.  I did my best to keep things neat, but that much super skinny wire (I think it's 8 layers per pole or something) makes it all-but-impossible.  The stock arm has a much wider winding leg, but is only two lams thick instead of three, so I don't think there's an overall weight difference that matters.  Even with the wider legs, this arm came in at a little under the first one, at 3.39 ohms per pole, so it's a bit warmer than the first one.  Of course, it's also powder coated and epoxied...but who knows whether it will "turn or burn"?

HO2_zps6dfe8c7d.jpg

 

-john


John Havlicek

#111 sidejobjon

sidejobjon

    On The Lead Lap

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Joined: 24-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NJ

Posted 19 October 2013 - 05:50 PM

John,

WOW Looks Great

Here is a picture of a simple balancer.

Thanks

Attached Images

  • arm bal.jpg

John Falzarano

#112 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 19 October 2013 - 06:48 PM

Thanks John...yep, that's a normal-type static balancing setup.  Not knowing how straight these shafts are, I'm almost afraid to even mess around making one.  There isn't a whole lot of material to remove on these things, and if the shaft is out even a little, it can take removing more material than is there in the first place.

 

-john


John Havlicek

#113 sidejobjon

sidejobjon

    On The Lead Lap

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Joined: 24-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NJ

Posted 19 October 2013 - 07:32 PM

John,

I am amazed, a couple days ago, we thought we would not see you till 2014.What kind numbers are you getting before you remove wire from the stock arms?

SJJ


John Falzarano

#114 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 20 October 2013 - 07:27 AM

Hi John,

 

     I've toyed with the idea of doing HO for a while, but without a suitable clamp for the tiny things, it's a no-go.  These pancake arms, being about the same diameter as FT36D lams, are doable because I can clamp those.  I guess you could say I've gotten "involved" now, so I'm motivated to make progress.  I saw some improvement on the second arm, so that makes me want to do some more as well.  These things are so small and fidgety that the amount of work that goes into them is pretty stupid, so these can only ever be a "fun" thing and I'll not be doing a bunch of them for people...that's for sure!

 

 

 

What kind numbers are you getting before you remove wire from the stock arms?

 

     If you mean resistance numbers, I've been getting "around" 8 ohms.  I haven't measured the wire length, and don't know what gauge is on there...but it's REALLY thin...like #38???  I doubt I'd be able to remove the wire by simply unwinding it without it breaking, and honestly it wouldn't be worth the effort to me.

 

-john


John Havlicek

#115 sidejobjon

sidejobjon

    On The Lead Lap

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Joined: 24-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NJ

Posted 22 October 2013 - 07:22 PM

Wow can't wait to test.
Thank you sir
John Falzarano

#116 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 24 October 2013 - 07:24 AM

John sent me a bare chassis to be able to test one of these things.  So I hooked it up and the arm (200/35) spun up nice................................................................................................................for about two seconds, then it stopped and smoked.  Opening it up for the post-mortem, one of the brushes had apparently welded itself to the com.  Not the desired outcome for sure, but certainly entertaining!  Pretty hard to tell what went wrong, even after the autopsy.

 

-john


John Havlicek

#117 Mark Johnson

Mark Johnson

    On The Lead Lap

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 426 posts
  • Joined: 27-March 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Minneapolis

Posted 25 October 2013 - 05:28 AM

  • John 11 feet of 35 on a stock blank will come out about 2.9- 3.0 ohms
  • and work good on a magnatracktion car on a fast layout .


#118 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 25 October 2013 - 06:30 AM

Hi Mark,

 

     I'm pretty sure the problem has nothing to do with the wind spec.  The way these things go, you just epoxy the commutator on top of the stack.  Problem is, the three poles would have to be the exact same height to wind up with the com spinning true.  With the com moving up and down really fast as it spins, there's no way to get it to stay in contact with the brushes.  The only answer is to rig a com-spacer for it to rest on, and the hole in the com is larger than the shaft anyway.

 

-john


John Havlicek

#119 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 26 October 2013 - 07:25 AM

More info.  John installed one of the arms and says it spun up real strong, so the 200T/#35 wind spec seems to be a good one for these.  I'm more and more convinced that finding a way to set the com "true" is where the problem lies.

 

-john


John Havlicek

#120 sidejobjon

sidejobjon

    On The Lead Lap

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Joined: 24-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NJ

Posted 27 October 2013 - 06:36 AM

The tjets have taps under chassis to ajust brush tension againest com, later AFX had springs . John do you think problem worse then that? See the shaft in post 111 longer Then shaft in 105. This part of shaft needs to go though top plate & hold drive gear.Is it short because of three lams?

Realy spins strong , Don`t know what the 125 wind would do.

Thanks again  SJJ


John Falzarano

#121 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 27 October 2013 - 12:30 PM

Hi John,

 

     Got another one done and the epoxy is curing.  Using the stock stack, I took it "down" to 190 turns, and it's a lot flatter and neater, so I think it will be a better fit in the chassis/motor thing...not much taller than stock.

 

-john


John Havlicek

#122 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 02 November 2013 - 08:42 AM

Two more "pancakes" for John Falzarano and I'm making some progress.  They're still not where I'd like them to be as far as neatness goes, but they meter nicely.  The left one uses the stock armature blank and has been powder coated, the right one is the stock arm blank with the stock coating (seems like some sort of lacquer or other paint).  The stock arm blank produces flatter coils than using the 36D lams, so I prefer it from a winding standpoint.  When you're doing around 200 turns of very thin wire, it's hard enough to tension the wire and keep things fairly neat without worrying about the shape of the coils.  I "think" that adding a third lam to the bottom of the stack might work, but these two-lam arms are nice to work on.  I think these will run very nicely!

HO190-35_zps346d710b.jpg

 

...I have another one clamped-up and ready to roll, now that I'm fairly set on patterning.

 

-john


John Havlicek

#123 sidejobjon

sidejobjon

    On The Lead Lap

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Joined: 24-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NJ

Posted 02 November 2013 - 12:30 PM

Wow the powder coat one looks great. What parts you need for testing? What did they OHM at?

LUCKY ME Thanks John F


John Falzarano

#124 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 02 November 2013 - 01:30 PM

Hi John,

 

     I actually like using the stock coating best.  I tried both the different powders I have and both produced a too-heavy coating for some reason.  Anyway, they both meter at a little over 3 ohms, with the non-powder coated one being almost dead-nuts-perfect from pole-to-pole, and a little more variation on the powder coated one.  I doubt these arms need to powder anyway, and neater is better most often with these things.  The last one I have chucked up right now will be "special". ;)

 

-john


John Havlicek

#125 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 03 November 2013 - 10:23 AM

Before I go out to tackle the leaves...again, I did up the third in this group of pancake arms.  This one should be more of a drag-type wind.  Things are still improving here as I figure out how to approach these tiny-and-bizarre stacks.  Anywho, this shouldn't quite "dim the lights in Fresno", but it should be pretty exciting!

HotPancakes_zpsc62d6145.jpg

 

-john


John Havlicek

#126 sidejobjon

sidejobjon

    On The Lead Lap

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Joined: 24-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NJ

Posted 03 November 2013 - 10:45 AM

John,

This looks amazing, what did this OHM at? When i read how to wind start wire goes one pole & finish end goes differant pole. These look same i know you said there not, so whats the deal? Your picture is so clear maybe i would be able to understand.

Thanks John


John Falzarano

#127 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 03 November 2013 - 10:59 AM

Hi John,

 

 

 

This looks amazing, what did this OHM at?

 

I only check for shorts at this stage, and can't read final resistance until the arm is finished.  The job-sequence I've settled on for these things makes it necessary for me to go in smaller steps than with a regular arm.  The arm in these pictures has been epoxied twice (once with the high-temp stuff to pot the coils, and once with JB Weld to secure the com to the top of the coils).  Next step would be to solder the tabs and then add one more teensy drop of epoxy to secure the wires to the bottom of the tabs.  After all that, I can then measure the arm's final resistance.

 

 

 

When i read how to wind start wire goes one pole & finish end goes differant pole. These look same i know you said there not, so whats the deal? Your picture is so clear maybe i would be able to understand.

 

Yes, the process is basically the same with these as with any other armature...with the added "thrills" resulting from such thin wire and such a small stack.  ***When I wind these, I start with some extra wire taped to the arm clamp and left dangling below.  The end of each "pole" has the end of that same piece of wire dangling below the other (finish) side of that pole.  Now you have a piece of wire dangling down from each side of the pole.  When you start the next pole, you also start with a piece of wire dangling below the pole, and that one will be right next to the "end-piece" of the previous pole.  So now there's two wires (the end piece from the first pole and the start piece from the second pole between the first and second pole) hanging at the start of the second pole.  As you finish each pole, you get the wires properly paired and wind up with three pairs (for a three pole armature) hanging below.  I keep the pairs secured to each other with a little piece of tape and I also put a really slight drop of CA glue (applied with a straight pin) between the poles to hold each pair while I continue winding.  In the end, it may look like the two wires are both coming from the same place *because I kept them in that orientation while working on them*, but they're not.

 

-john


John Havlicek

#128 sidejobjon

sidejobjon

    On The Lead Lap

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Joined: 24-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NJ

Posted 06 November 2013 - 06:46 PM

John,
I will say it again, I am into HO But with all the Masters on Slot blog ,I spend more time here, with all history here. I been reading & injoying your post drooling over your builds , I am now honored to have some of your amazing work in my collection . looks like you mastered this also in no time.
Thanks again for taking project on.
SJJ
John Falzarano

#129 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 06 November 2013 - 07:25 PM

Hi John,

 

     Thanks very much.  It's easy to be good at what I do...because I only do one small thing :)  I have built a fair number of chassis and cars over the years, but they pale in comparison to what Rick, Steve, Jairus, Dennis and others show here regularly.  Anyway, the last three I sent you come much closer to where I'd like to see these things.  I'll be happy to do some more for you now that they're pretty consistent.  For now, run 'em and enjoy 'em!

 

-john


John Havlicek

#130 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 08 November 2013 - 07:53 AM

One for the vintage crowd.  A Mabuchi 16D stack.  Tossed the stack insulators, powder coated, drill blank shaft, Kirkwood com, spaced for FT16D end bell drive (I have a nice can and some Arcos) and done up 55T/#29 with mild advance.  The wind comes in at a bit over .4 ohm...off to be balanced, and then to build the rest of the motor when she gets back.

 

SANY0003_zpsd834d2a2.jpg

 

-john


  • Gator Bob likes this
John Havlicek

#131 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 09 November 2013 - 09:38 AM

Here's a copy of some epoxying tips I had sent to another Blogger who also uses Duralco 4461.  Getting the mix ratio to work by experimentation is important, but also the way you apply the stuff is just as important.  Long ago, I stopped just applying the stuff and continually flipping the arm until it stops running.  4461 is very viscous to start with (a good thing for full penetration of the coils!) and gets even more so when warmed (an even better thing IF you're careful).  For putting together small batches for an arm or so, syringes used for adhesives (wood, wallpaper etc.) work well:
 

I've gotten used to a ratio that works by using syringes used for wallpaper paste.  I use a small blob of resin about half the size of a dime (but thicker because of consistency) and add two drops (with a fine syringe) of hardener/catayst.  When you get close to the right mix, even arms that don't cure at first will still cure (most times) after repeated baking...but too much catalyst will cause the stuff to foam (instant garbage).

 

This type is good for the resin:

 


http://www.amazon.co...pd_sim_sbs_hi_8

 

There are ones with finer tips that are good for the cataylst.  You could even use "needle oilers" if you can find then unused.  Something like this would work:

 


http://www.amazon.co...s=glue syringes


The resin ones can be carefully used and reused (spilling can be a problem) and if you fill the resin syringe half way so there's room to operate the plunger, yolu can do a lot of arms with one syringe full.
 

The catalyst ones should be discarded as old catalyst kept out at room temp will spoil faster and old catalyst residue will contaminate the new stuff you just added if you add new cataylst over the old stuff (unless you clean the tube well first).  Avoid getting the catalyst on you as it's a strong oxidizer.  The uncatalyzed resin is fairly safe.

 

 

For applying the epoxy, here's a tip:
 

Remember also that the amount of resin you catalyze will also affect the cure.  Once catalyzed, the resin/catalyst mixture will generate heat which can speed the cure.  Doing a test by just mixing a small amount and not putting it on an arm won't "necessarily" give the same cure results as putting the epoxy on an arm.  A mix ratio that won't work on an arm, but left in a cup could cure much faster than a thin film on an arm because of the heat the resin gives off when curing.

 

A good way to get excellent flow and penetration of the coils is to preheat the arm a little so it's good and warm to the touch, and THEN add a small amount of resin to the bottom of the arm coils with a toothpick.  Because the resin is very viscous, and gets even more so when it's warmed up, you should see the resin penetrate the arm coils almost instantly.  Then flip the arm upright and add the resin to the tops of the coils and around the com tabs (carefully!) and a tiny bit on the sides of the coils, and gravity will let it penetrate and run down without running over the com.  Put the arm in the oven and check the bottom of it after a couple of minutes.  If you see excess at the bottom, you can wipe that off before it cures with a small square of paper towel (I cut them up to about 2 inches square and keep a stack of them handy on my table for stuff like this).  You'll quickly get used to how much epoxy will work without running out the bottom.  This is MUCH better than coating the arm and continually flipping it to prevent running and will penetrate the arm pretty much as well as the commercial arms that are done with a vacuum bag.  I've taken apart arms like this to see how well it works and have found epoxy all the way to the inside of the coils.

 

 

 

The above all pretty much applies to any epoxy resin, although the syringes aren't necessary for the 1:1 mix ratio hardware store stuff.  Also the stuff in the hardware store is a much thicker consistency so you can be a little less careful (only a little) avoiding runs...but it's not particularly good for potting arms in the first place.

 

-john


John Havlicek

#132 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 09 November 2013 - 09:55 AM

...and on the epoxy itself, the bulk of it should be kept in a refigerator...cool and dark will GREATLY extend the life of the material.  I keep out only the small amount in the syringes, and keep the bulk (and my powder-coat epoxy as well) in a refirgerator.  The resin will last much longer than the catalyst which (as a strong oxidizer) can go bad quickly if not kept cool.  If you spend the beaucoup bucks to get the good stuff, it REALLY pays to protect it best as you can.  If you're using the hardware store stuff...who cares anyway? :)

 

-john


John Havlicek

#133 SlotStox#53

SlotStox#53

    Posting Leader

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,843 posts
  • Joined: 13-March 13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:TX

Posted 09 November 2013 - 06:47 PM

Thanks for posting the ins & outs of Epoxy coating a slot car armature John :good: All the info at hand to understand how to do it....  Will make do with some hardware store stuff first to get the hang of it :D Rick T seems to have good success with the Devcon 2 Ton epoxy so will give that a go.

 

Btw that Mabuchi 16D arm looks mighty sweet John :)



#134 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 10 November 2013 - 12:42 AM

Hi Paul,

 

     Always glad to share.  The Devcon stuff is OK for mild arms, there's also a lacquer that is used for this stuff that's a very thin/viscous material that penetrates exceptionally well and is probably as good temperature-wise (up to 200-250F), but I don't know where to get the stuff, and the Devcon is easy to find.  The "regular" Devcon is better than the fast set type by a little in the temperature department, and the fast set stuff can set too fast!

 

-john


John Havlicek

#135 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 10 November 2013 - 01:08 PM

Actually, there's some pretty cool looking stuff when you search under silicone impregnating varnish that's good up to almost 500F.  As always though, you gotta buy industrial quantities.

 

-john


John Havlicek

#136 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 10 November 2013 - 03:47 PM

...and another one for the vintage guys.  This one is headed for the mighty Mura Green Can.  A #27 wind (a favorite of mine) done on a new blank I assembled with a vintage NOS com.  This one (33T/#27) comes in at .181Ω and, in a nice tight old Mura C should be tons o' fun!  First, it's going out for a very light grind ("skinning") and balancing.

 

CArmComp_edited-1_zps1336193b.jpg

 

-john


  • slotbaker and Gator Bob like this
John Havlicek

#137 SlotStox#53

SlotStox#53

    Posting Leader

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,843 posts
  • Joined: 13-March 13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:TX

Posted 10 November 2013 - 11:58 PM

Beautiful arm John :good: that is going to look sweet all buttoned up in a Green can ! Should go very sweetly too!

Reminds me I will have to finish that lovely minty fresh Green can with that sweet 25# arm you wound for me , all carefully under wraps waiting for a couple of Rod & Custom builds to be built , before I tackle it..

Gotta get some 6mm bb for it too, semi assembled and looking/feeling very powerful indeed :D

Keep up the great work John .

#138 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 11 November 2013 - 08:09 AM

Hi Paul and thanks very much!
 

 

 

Reminds me I will have to finish that lovely minty fresh Green can with that sweet 25# arm you wound for me , all carefully under wraps waiting for a couple of Rod & Custom builds to be built , before I tackle it..

 

For sure.  A Mura with a #25 is pretty "classic", and in the right chassis makes for a ballistic ride!  The arms in the "mid class" like the 27 are still very fast, but you don't have to "white knuckle" it so much. :D  Years ago, I screwed with slot cars a little during my second go-around (after having stopped in the '60's) and really enjoyed the old G20 motors.  I built several wire-only perimeter chassis for them...super light...and with a good high-downforce body, they were a total hoot to drive.  Those were later C-can motors (and of course, this arm could easily go into a modern C as well), but the idea is the same.  

 

Anyway, for the last of these three motors, I'll be doing my favorite "new" motor...the JK Hawk of course!  I like to think of them as sort of a "C-motor" for the masses.  At $15, they prove that there "could" be inexpensive/rebuildable C-motor racing because there's nothing in them that isn't just a scaled down C-motor.  I still don't quite understand why people (aside from what they're being sold) run D-motors when the smaller/lighter/more efficient C-motor is a much better candidate.  The JK Hawk takes that a step further, being smaller and lighter still.  Like the "C", there's loads of potential in the little Hawk to stuff much better arms in there, and I've been doing that since they came out.  VERY cool motor!

 

-john


John Havlicek

#139 sidejobjon

sidejobjon

    On The Lead Lap

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Joined: 24-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NJ

Posted 12 November 2013 - 06:50 PM

Lets see how John`s Havlicek first panckes "Photo 1" run. Now to get them in a Chassis.Need a spacer .300 not to make gear to tight."Photo 3"

To be continued

SJJ

Attached Images

  • john `s winds 001.jpg
  • john `s winds 002.jpg
  • john `s winds 003.jpg

John Falzarano

#140 sidejobjon

sidejobjon

    On The Lead Lap

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Joined: 24-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NJ

Posted 12 November 2013 - 06:56 PM

OK some more steps. Motor press photo 4. Gear hole to large , i get a ball bearing smash with hammer photo 5. photo 6 all there on top plates.

 

OK getting there

SJJ

Attached Images

  • john `s winds 004.jpg
  • john `s winds 005.jpg
  • john `s winds 006.jpg

John Falzarano

#141 sidejobjon

sidejobjon

    On The Lead Lap

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Joined: 24-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NJ

Posted 12 November 2013 - 07:03 PM

Other side of 3 top plates photo 8. Get a flat Chassis , some super II mags & La-Ganke brushes.

Come on you large scale guys remember all this.There are other treads that tell you what else to do, remember now they been working on these Pancakes-TJETS for 50 years now. Drum roll please.

SJJ

Attached Images

  • john `s winds 008.jpg
  • john `s winds 009.jpg

John Falzarano

#142 sidejobjon

sidejobjon

    On The Lead Lap

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Joined: 24-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NJ

Posted 12 November 2013 - 07:11 PM

John Havlicek,

You are outstanding, Thats why you are the master. sweet sounding Motor & the Blue powder coat looks Cool as H#$@. No  wonder there was not enough room for your winds on one tread.

As far as photo 10 John gets a big 10.john `s winds 010.jpg


John Falzarano

#143 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 12 November 2013 - 07:43 PM

Hi John,

 

     First off...thanks for keeping me posted. :D  Many times I send motors out and never hear anything...like the went into a black hole or something.  In most cases, I'm not that curious anyway, but with motors like these that are so different from what I'm used to, I definitely wanted to know.  Anyway, I'm glad they worked out for you.  Maybe sometime I'll try some of those little square-can type motors.  I'll just have to make up a clamp, but this makes me want to dig in a little more...maybe.

 

-john


John Havlicek

#144 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 16 November 2013 - 10:03 AM

     Here's one for all the rewinders out there ( both of you :)  , because I figure it's a good thing to share info...at least some of it anyway.   I sometimes set out on little quests to figure stuff out.  Recently, I got myself involved with seeing what could be done with an FT36D motor, and keeping the stock magnets, springs, endbell.  When I was a kid, keeping costs down was paramount, and I didn't spend much time looking at improved hardware, or even remember seeing much of it.  We'd usually tear a motor apart only when it was totally caput (later on when the "bug" really hit hard, we'd buy them and rip them open brand new).  Of course, you could get a little more by simply dewinding the arm a bit, but we always wanted more!

    So I went for a #28 wind on a full stack and, as always, you need to find the balance between not enough and too much wire.  Fitting it on such a huge honking stack isn't a problem of course although, for some reason it seemed back then as it was ALWAYS a problem, and jamming it on there with a popsickle stick or whatever was handy was de riguer.  After a couple of tries, I settled on 50T/#28.  I also used a Tradeship com as my one "upgrade" because I simply couldn't bear doing the work and pretty much guaranteeing the arm would grenade sooner than later.  ***One "problem" with this wind on the 36D arm is that, starting out at the com as always, the last wind ends up at the outside (odd number of layers instead of even) instead of back at the com or even part way.  You can just run the wire back to the com over the top of the coils, but that's a sloppy (and less mechanically sound) way to have at it.  It occurred to me several years ago, when the same sort of situation happened, that you could simply start winding at the outside of the stack towards the com instead of the "normal" way from the inside-out.  I don't know if this sort of thing could be easily done with winding machines, so it may even be a "hand-winding-only" sort of deal (???).  This does present  a couple of difficulties, but nothing insurmountable if you try it a few times, and it makes for a very tight coil once you master it...because you're starting from a "dead-end" at the back of the crown where the wire can't move, and working towards the com.  It's kind of a "mind-tweak" until you get things sorted...but it works really well indeed!  I only use this "special pattern" when necessary, but there are many ways to wrap wire around an arm blank.  Think outside the box!

    So here's the arm "wound backwards" with the Tradeship 36D com (I have a box of them in various advances...this one is the 22 degree one).  The eagle-eyed among you will notice the "giveaway" by how the wires wind up at the com tabs :)  Anyway, it's a very strong runner in the completely stock setup.  I forget exactly, but it meters somewhere around .350 ohms and draws about an amp at 6V...staying cool and spinning up with authority if you goose it to 12V.  

 

SpecPattern36D_zpsb143a657.jpg

 

-john


  • Gator Bob likes this
John Havlicek

#145 SlotStox#53

SlotStox#53

    Posting Leader

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,843 posts
  • Joined: 13-March 13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:TX

Posted 16 November 2013 - 06:17 PM

Beautiful big block arm John! That came out really well
:D love the blue stack insulation coating . Nice to hear the standard setups can do rewinds justice so well.

Cool information for winding outside to inside , always handy to have more information! Noted down & stored for my voyage into rewinding....... Now if I can just finish a couple of cars its all systems go :laugh2:

#146 Dan Miller

Dan Miller

    Backmarker

  • Full Member
  • PipPip
  • 69 posts
  • Joined: 07-March 09

Posted 17 November 2013 - 12:57 PM

John,

 

Over the years I have made many armatures with an odd number of layers of wire. To lay the last turn over the top of the coils to terminate at the commutator is quite acceptable. Study many Open class armatures being made today, as well as some of today's wilder Scale armatures and you will notice this is a standard practice. Yes, you have to use your head when applying the technique. As well, you have to craft your winding pattern, number of turns and create a somewhat mechanical lock to be able to accomplish this with reasonable reliability in mind. How you lay the last turn is important.

 

The fastest armatures of today, from an RPM standpoint, are Scale armatures. These are operated with 7.5 - 1 gear ratios and use rather small diameter rear tires. They peak out higher than Open wing cars. Some of the most popular winds made for this form of racing are 18/24.5, 19/25 and 20/25.5 winds. All have the last turn laying down on the top of the coils, to run the wire to the commutator, from outside of the coils. 

 

The vast majority of Open class wing car armatures all show the same technique as well. Look at 16/24, 17/24.5 18/25 and 19/25 armatures used on King tracks. All will have that distinct, outside to inside, lay down method, on the top of the coils, to route the last turn toward the commutator tab.

 

As you state, it may look sloppy but it is absolutely necessary with some armature winds. At least with 75% of the armatures I wind.

 

Dan Miller

 

.


  • Dave Reed likes this

#147 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 17 November 2013 - 01:51 PM

Hi Dan,

 

     Thanks for chiming in!  Yes, I have seen a fair amount of arms terminated this way and even done a few myself.  What I did was simply cut the last end of the wire a bit long and then relax the last loop a bit so I could slip it underneath before heading "home" to the com.  It kind of forms a "lock" that way and if it's strong enough for those scale motors, I'm sure it's strong period!  Still, I like to go my own way and like how the coils come out.  I'm also not finishing the arm with the wire flopping around.  The one possible drawback I can see is that my method does the equivalent of slightly increasing the stack height.  It's ALWAYS good to hear from someone who's been there/done that as much...and as successfully as you have!  Not many (well...make that no one) are willing to share. ;)

 

-john


  • Dave Reed likes this
John Havlicek

#148 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 18 November 2013 - 07:56 AM

 

 

Beautiful big block arm John! That came out really well 
:D love the blue stack insulation coating . Nice to hear the standard setups can do rewinds justice so well.

Cool information for winding outside to inside , always handy to have more information! Noted down & stored for my voyage into rewinding....... Now if I can just finish a couple of cars its all systems go  :laugh2: 

 

Hi Paul and thanks again!

The blue powder coat is a Sol Epoxy product and it's excellent.  Honestly, what I like about it is that it's closer to the color of the coating on the old Mura arms.  It doesn't work as well as I'd like with the membrane I use in my powder coating fluid bed, and I'm not getting enough "lift".  That results in a thicker coating than I'd like...but it's fine for these arms.  The 3M product I have (thanks to a Blogger!) works really well in my system but comes out a brownish green color.  I also really like the contrast between the blue and the color of the wire.  It makes it easier to see what's going on as you wind... a BIG plus!

 

On the standard Mabuchi setups, it is a challenge to get them to work well and not disintegrate.  I don't care much for when people put modern brush hoods on them or even stick modern arms in them (in the case of the FT16D).  It's sort of like..."what's the point?, you may as well just run a modern motor if you want less difficulty!".  I've been guilty of doing "some" non-period-correct stuff, but really only as "what-if" type experiments most of the time.  By the time you get into the Mura C motors, you're pretty much into (still!) modern motor performance and design, so you can do a lot more crazy stuff...like run a #25 wind and have it actually work...for a while anyway! ;)

Anyway, my main point here was to share the idea that there are all kinds of ways to skin this cat.  An armature is nothing more than three electromagnets firing in sequence within a permanent field.  How you make those three magnets and get the coils on there is open to all kinds of approaches.

 

-john


John Havlicek

#149 havlicek

havlicek

    OCD Rewinder

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,019 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NY

Posted 23 November 2013 - 03:34 PM

I Figure it must be time again for a "step-by-step" rewind, hopefully a help for someone out there :D

 

I give you the ubiquitous "blue wire" Mabuchi 26D (the "poor man's race motor"):

26DStockE_zpseb056206.jpg

 

Prying the tabs open to satisfy my voyeuristic tendencies, I find 75 turns of what seems like #30 wire and the not-very-stout Mabuchi com:

 

26DArmStockE_zpsf25a8a9c.jpg

 

We can DEFINITELY do better than that mess, and after stripping...the thing looks better already!

26DArmStrippedE_zpsd31f64a4.jpg

 

First things first.  Toss that com (and those fiber stack insulators in this case...although they can work OK with a little tweaking) and substitute a NOS Kirkwood, carefully bending the tabs so they don't stick out that far.  Afterwards, cut new tail and com spacers, temporarily assemble the arm to be sure it can be centered in the field later on.  When it's all good, the spacers get tacked in place with a teensy drop of CA glue.  BTW, it can be a help with many wind patterns to use the same diameter spacer material at both the com and the arm tail:

 

26DArmRebuiltE_zpsdf98037e.jpg

 

Now, remove the com and mask off the shaft so no powder coat will get on it...because the stuff is impossible to get off:

26DArmPreppedForPowderE_zpsf26dc7ee.jpg

 

A little preheating, a dip in the fluid bed, a little post-cure afterwards and you get a super hard, durable and very heat-resistant insulating coating that almost seems like a ceramic:

 

26DArmAfterPowderE_zpsf6cbe428.jpg

 

Then it's down to permanently setting the com (and dialing in any advance), although you can set the com after winding...and it's off to LaGanke Land:

26DArmReWoundE_zps0035b2d8.jpg

 

After all this, the com tabs get soldered or in this case they got welded.  Of course, before epoxying, you also want to meter the arm to see that all is good (and it is!) Next time, finishing the arm and then onto building the motor!

 

-john


  • slotbaker and Robert BG like this
John Havlicek

#150 slotbaker

slotbaker

    Dan Gurney Fan

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,256 posts
  • Joined: 16-February 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney, Australia.

Posted 23 November 2013 - 04:05 PM

Love this stuff... Thanks for taking the time to do the step by step..

:good:


  • havlicek likes this

Steve King






Electric Dreams Online Shop