#2876
Posted 26 May 2011 - 03:57 PM
BTW- I finally got some different size wire, so now I can try another wind using the right size wire lol.
Vic
#2877
Posted 26 May 2011 - 05:45 PM
#2878
Posted 26 May 2011 - 06:47 PM
Yep i am with everyone else john keep posting your wonderful motor builds it's also the first section i check when i log on and i am really a slot body painter that's what i really do well, Vic that little motor looks very fast let us know how it works out, also glad to here we may be seeing more rewinds from you i can't wait to see what you come up with.
Robert,
Thanks for the thumbs up. I built that one just to sell for drag racing and I think it will make a good bracket motor
And don't worry, I plan to start winding up some arms after this holliday weekend. I have a few different wire sizes now , as
well as blanks and coms, epoxy , ect, all ready to go. Now I just have to get it down pat, and I know I will .
We are taking Joe camping for the long weekend, but as soon as we get back home I plan to dive right in lol
That is, after I cut the grass and get my honey do list done !!
Now see John ? I would never have gotten into this if it hadn't been for this thread and all the people involved with it like yourself
I don't know if I should kick you, or shake your hands
Vic
#2879
Posted 26 May 2011 - 11:00 PM
dc
#2880
Posted 28 May 2011 - 08:24 AM
Here's a pair of arms I did for Marty N. He specified a 65T/#30awg wind on Bill Bugenis stacks and coms, and to a length to fit a Hawk setup. This was a cool job for me because 65T/#30awg (as well as 50-55T/#29awg) is my favorite "manageable wind" for Mabuchi FT16D motors. In the Mabuchi, it's a very strong wind with lots of torque and much better top end than stock...yet it can live with some minor tweaks to the Mabuchi setup...post protectors, better springs and magnets. Here, the wind is on a shorter stack with a much MUCH better com (welded) and will reside in a thoroughly modern setup. They should run really well! Marty will send them out for dynamic balancing, but I kept the epoxy to a minimum, polished the stacks and cut the coms.
-john
- MarcusPHagen likes this
#2881
Posted 28 May 2011 - 08:37 AM
Is that a 13D in the upper left corner? If so can you show more about that one
#2882
Posted 28 May 2011 - 09:18 AM
Is that a 13D in the upper left corner? If so can you show more about that one
Hi Rob,
The motors are packed up and on their way to europe but fortunately, that was opne of the ones I found interesting enough to take a separate picture of. The "13" (I believe the formal name is something like 13UO or similar) has always been a head-scratcher for me. It's an awfully appealing package for a narrow inline aplication, but I think it was originally intended as a "homeset motor" by Mabuchi. As a kid, I loved the idea of the motor but never had any success getting one to perform well and last. On this particular motor, I installed a set of very thin modern ceramic magnets that measure quite strong. They were a pretty near perfect fit for the "13", and the magnets alone completely change the equation here. I did (I think) a #30 wind as I would for an FT16D intended as a runner and sleeved the spring posts with aluminum tubing, added rebent D-motor springs and then just did an average setup. The stack is original, and I replaced the shaft with a drill blank and used a modern D-motor com. The endbell hardware is OK on these as there's a bottom plate and top "hood" that is functionally not unlike the Mura setup and of course predates it...although a little sloppier fitting. I think it's actually a better design idea than the FT16D arrangement of brush tubes/"heatsinks" and hoods and the same basic idea that most modern motors still use. On this particular motor, neither the end bell bushing nor the can bushing were appreciably worn, so the setup was pretty "tight" (for a Mabuchi anyway) and the motor runs really strong ...seemingly comfortably into FT16D rewind territoryand seems like it should "live" just fine.
The motors (even the ones I've just recently done) all pretty much run together at this point, so I think everything I said above is correct
-john
#2883
Posted 28 May 2011 - 09:58 AM
Thanks guys
Here's a pair of arms I did for Marty N. He specified a 65T/#30awg wind on Bill Bugenis stacks and coms, and to a length to fit a Hawk setup. This was a cool job for me because 65T/#30awg (as well as 50-55T/#29awg) is my favorite "manageable wind" for Mabuchi FT16D motors. In the Mabuchi, it's a very strong wind with lots of torque and much better top end than stock...yet it can live with some minor tweaks to the Mabuchi setup...post protectors, better springs and magnets. Here, the wind is on a shorter stack with a much MUCH better com (welded) and will reside in a thoroughly modern setup. They should run really well! Marty will send them out for dynamic balancing, but I kept the epoxy to a minimum, polished the stacks and cut the coms.
-john
All of them are Very, very nice!
John, what material do you use to tie up with?
Bob Israelite
#2884
Posted 28 May 2011 - 10:09 AM
I asked John to wind these arms at two seperate timing numbers with all else equal. As you know the JK commutator is really small and timed 25*. One arm duplicates that timing. The other is adjusted to match the "effective" timing. The difference in commutator sizing actually works out to 7* but I asked for just a 5* adjustment to keep my records and numbers simple. After a few cuts on the comm the timing will fall right in place.
I've been working this car for a few weeks perfecting the set up and going through stages of motor preperation to extract the most I could from a 65/30 wind in stock form. I have dyno and track data if you guys would be interested in looking at that data. I tell all. Not one of those keep it secret guys
I will be testing some other vendor's armatures as well for comparison data. Alpha, Proslot and Koford, maybe even a BOW or Mura. This could get interesting. I'll also be testing other magnets and perfecting spring, bush, air gaps and the like.
Absolutely beautiful work John!!! Should be a big step up in power and reliablity. Let me know if you guys want the feed back or not, Okay?
So hard a judge they hope never to meet as themselves.
#2885
Posted 28 May 2011 - 10:48 AM
I do like to share the builds, but never want to wear out my welcome here at SlotBlog!
I would have to contradict you on that comment John! I know I'm always waiting for more pics of your builds along with the other members like Vic and Robert too!
If I may ask everyone please, what is it about the motor builds that get you really excited? For me, it's seeing the metamorphosis.
Thanks John for sharing!
Ernie
#2886
Posted 28 May 2011 - 11:39 AM
Thanks as always Ernie I had done a bunch of motors for this guy before, but they honestly were kind of a hodgepodge of mismatched parts and in "less-than-pristine" condition. This group however was overall a really nice assortment of NOS and lightly used...as well as matching parts. By itself, it's like getting a pretty cool vintage motor collection in one shot, although without the collector value as the work is all new.
-john
#2887
Posted 28 May 2011 - 11:43 AM
All of them are Very, very nice!
John, what material do you use to tie up with?
I use kevlar thread, the kind used for tying flies, but have changed the way I use it (hey...I gotta have at least some secrets!) a little, for a couple of reasons. I also have some of what I believe is kevlar fishing leader that was given to me by Bill Bugenis. Truthfully, unwaxed dental floss or even 100% cotton thread is probably fine for most arms, since the temperature at which cotton burns or significantly weakens is pretty high...maybe 350 to 400 degrees F or so?
-john
#2888
Posted 28 May 2011 - 12:46 PM
I intend to live forever! So far, so good.
#2889
Posted 28 May 2011 - 12:58 PM
Linen thread is probably better than cotton, the material is stronger yet still absorbent to soak up the epoxy. Good one!
-john
#2890
Posted 28 May 2011 - 01:48 PM
Pardon my "lack of knowledge" but may I ask you a question please? I've been looking at the motors you've rewound for me and I cannot determine which is the positive or negative post; I don't' see any obvious markings that would assist me in determining which is which.
If I place the motor in an anglewinder chassis and looking at the endbell, I'm guessing that the rear post closest to the rear axle is the positive post while the post closest to the front axle is the negative?
Thank you for your patience in my asking.
Ernie
#2891
Posted 28 May 2011 - 02:50 PM
I intend to live forever! So far, so good.
#2892
Posted 28 May 2011 - 03:58 PM
It is really appreciated!
Ernie
#2893
Posted 28 May 2011 - 05:12 PM
-john
#2894
Posted 28 May 2011 - 06:09 PM
BTW doesn't timing effect direction?
If the south magnet is at the rear, what happens when these are shipped down under?
Bob Israelite
#2895
Posted 28 May 2011 - 06:13 PM
anal-retentive,
-john
- - - -
John FYI, I would check with der Administrators before using that word, they may pull your post.
Bob Israelite
#2896
Posted 28 May 2011 - 06:14 PM
-john
#2897
Posted 28 May 2011 - 07:37 PM
Wow @ 102,075 Views this is a hot topic. More then some lady GaGa youtubes
BTW doesn't timing effect direction?
If the south magnet is at the rear, what happens when these are shipped down under?
Timing will effect which direction(CW or CCW) an arm runs the best, but not change a motor's polarities. A hemi wound arm will. I don't keep track of which are north & south magnets. But I do have the poles on my zapper marked so I can determine & wire all my motors without needing to cross motor leads. That's important to know if doing a motor change during a race.
John, I would say anal-retentive is okay. Back when I was a moderator here, I wouldn't have blinked an eye when seeing it. Not all anal-retentive people are detail-oriented.
I intend to live forever! So far, so good.
#2898
Posted 29 May 2011 - 05:31 AM
Wow @ 102,075 Views this is a hot topic. More then some lady GaGa youtubes
BTW doesn't timing effect direction?
If the south magnet is at the rear, what happens when these are shipped down under?
Just to restate what Bill said, the timing advance of the arm will determine which direction (CW or CCW) the motor will spin faster. In order to have the motor spin in that direction, you may wind up with the positive lead on the top or the bottom of the motor when it's installed in the car depending on how the magnets are oriented in the can. Of course, this goes for two-magnet motors. I haven't a clue what the deal is with open frame and padlock motors...they scare me. They scare me even more when they have 5 and 7 poles arms!
-john
#2899
Posted 29 May 2011 - 08:37 AM
After cutting the length of the can and truing/squaring it, I also opened up the top and bottom holes for a little better breathing/airflow and then polished the can up...taking it to #600 before taking the felt wheel to it because (as Rick sez!)...shiny stuff just goes faster!:
For motivating the setup to move forward, I built an arm using Bill Bugenis' parts. I've settled on a stack length for WalnutsTM and StrapnutsTM of .330" (seems to work about right) and, after assembly, did a #28 single wind...tensioning the wire to just this side of breaking it. As a matter of fact, I did have to redo one pole because...er...I broke the wire . Anyway, the arm came out very nicely and meters consistently as far as I can tell with my less-than-NASA-spec meter. I put a lot of wire on this thing, so I used a special winding pattern that produces a compact coil and can help when the number of turns doesn't work out for the arm blank. With it epoxied, tied and a fresh cut, it looks like this:
I'm going to probably send this one out for dynamic balancing, because I figure it deserves it
-john
- MarcusPHagen likes this
#2900
Posted 29 May 2011 - 10:08 AM
Jairus H Watson - Artist
Need something painted, soldered, carved, or killed? - jairuswtsn@aol.com
www.slotcarsmag.com
www.jairuswatson.net
http://www.ratholecustoms.com
Check out some of the cool stuff on my Fotki!